unknown walls/boulders?

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
mazzystr
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 2:20 pm

unknown walls/boulders?

Post by mazzystr »

During a bushwack this past weekend I saw 2 large boulders and 2 walls between Fortress Wall and Phantasia Wall that arent in a guide books or online guide book.

Does anyone know their status/names/route info?
Thanks,
-Chris
kafish2
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:36 am

Post by kafish2 »

Dude, you stumbled onto my ultra-secret training grounds, stay off!!! Access is denied to all!

Just joking but someone needed to reply right?
J-Rock
Posts: 1936
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 9:30 pm

Post by J-Rock »

Yeah, I walked that cliffline all the way from Fortress to Phantasia 5 or 6 years ago and we did some trad routes, but never told anybody about them (nothing too noteworthy). We also accidentally stumbled into a turkey vulture nest and the fuzzy baby vulture kept hissing at me very loudly. I didn't want to disturb it so we quickly retreated and rappeled down.
"Those iron spikes you use have shortened the life expectancy of the Totem Pole by 50,000 years."

--A Navaho elder
mazzystr
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 2:20 pm

Post by mazzystr »

The walls looked pretty nice. one wall had a nice flake system similiar to Party Time at Fortress and the other wall had a real nice crack system. it was my 2nds first time tradding so i didnt want to drag him up a FA without knowing the "ropes" heehee. the rock quality was very nice.

Is there any other reason why they havent been developed? access wasn't bad at all. actually at times i thought i was following an rarely used established trail, could've been an animal run though becuase of droppings.

Who would I have to speak to in developing routes here?

Thanks,
-C
Huggybone
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 12:08 am

Post by Huggybone »

I believe that is forest service land. If you want to climb the routes, go ahead, but if you want to build trails and stuff, talk to either the forest service or the RRGCC.
"Before enlightenment, chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood, carry water."
mazzystr
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 2:20 pm

Post by mazzystr »

sounds good.

same thing goes for establishing sport routes?
squeezindlemmon
Posts: 1452
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 7:02 pm

Post by squeezindlemmon »

If it is indeed FS land, then you wouldn't want to be putting in sport routes since they don't allow the use of those powerful hammer drills (I think).

For any new routes at the Red, I also think you had to get in touch with the RRGCC and send in a request form....
http://www.rrgcc.org/index16349.php
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our mind. ~Bob Marley
User avatar
Ascentionist
Posts: 1081
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:23 pm

Post by Ascentionist »

I don't thikn you have to go through the RRGCC. You should be able to go directly to the FS.

I might be wrong, but I don't think so.
There is no TEAM in I
rhino
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 2:56 pm

Post by rhino »

Just the FS
"Hookers and drugs man. Money can't buy happiness but it's really hard not to smile when you're in a cheap hotel room surrounded by hookers and drugs." ~ Charlie
User avatar
Ascentionist
Posts: 1081
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:23 pm

Post by Ascentionist »

Yeah, you could go through what quite a few climbers went through a few years ago when they went through the RRGCC and had their applications tabled at the RRGCC level. Never made it to the FS even because they were considered too low a priority on the Coalition's list of things to do.

That would have been fine, except the applications were invited. Then "lost".

Of course, very few of the coalition members knew that they had decided collectively to ignore the applications. It wasn't really a democratic decision in my opinion.

I may open the wrong can of worms by saying this. Hope not, just trying to be informative.
There is no TEAM in I
Post Reply