Sandbag or Fluff:

Gaston? High Step? Drop Knee? Talk in here.
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by climb2core »

dustonian wrote:
climb2core wrote:...new climbs coming out in the hard 11 range are more likely that they should fall in the easy 12 range. Sandbagging seems to be hitting new levels...
Your presumptuous tone and attempt to call out individual developers tends to knot panties into a nice sloppy double-bowline.
First you edit my words to remove qualification:
climb2core wrote:Seems like a lot of the new climbs coming out in the hard 11 range are more likely that they should fall in the easy 12 range. Sandbagging seems to be hitting new levels... but then again I can understand why:

http://www.redriverclimbing.com/RRCGuid ... te&id=2473
Presmptuous?

pre·sump·tu·ous
/priˈzəmpCH(o͞o)əs/
Adjective
(of a person or their behavior) Failing to observe the limits of what is permitted or appropriate.

Is it really inappropriate to talk about grades? Isn't that what we do on here? C'mon. Get real. It looks like this is turning out to be the best useless thread in a while.

Lastly Der Uber asked me to give examples.
Last edited by climb2core on Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dustonian
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by dustonian »

You speaking Canadian or something?

pre·sump·tu·ous
adjective
1. full of, characterized by, or showing presumption or readiness to presume in conduct or thought.

Meaning that you initiated this thread under the presumption that the new routes were sandbagged rather than considering the alternative explanations that other routes are soft or that your technique might be deficient in some particular area(s). However, I do agree that it is a good useless thread!
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by climb2core »

I think it is presumptuous of you to assume that I believe anything I am writing. Btw, can you really use the root word of a word to define a word?
























Stir. Stir.
Andrew
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:40 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by Andrew »

climb2core wrote:To Wheatley's defense, he has no understanding of grading as his mutant arms by pass cruxes that he never knew existed.
I can't tell you how many times I have said this to people. I am way to tall to be grading things. The problem with being tall is that some stuff is way harder for me and some stuff is way easier. So getting the grade accurate is difficult.

I will also say that I have a tendency to bolt routes with non-typical RRG style. I tend to be good at figuring out funky beta to make moves easier. Its not my fault yall cant figure out how to climb. I also usually have a few people climb the route before I grade it and I will take the consensus grade.

As far as "here comes palin" is concerned the FA was done by trending left at the "crux". The route flows very well that way and is not outside the realm of off route and a few repeaters of the roue agreed that this was the logical approach to the climb. It also keeps the route more consistent. We can start upgrading everything if people want to take the hard way up routes. I surely can make Mr. Bungle 5.13 with the right beta.

Shadow is right, yall complain about FREE new routes. Go bolt your own if you don't like the grade. I promise that I try to grade routes accurately while adhering to the "solid for the grade" philosophy. Too many gimmies at the RRG.
Living the dream
whoneedsfeet
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by whoneedsfeet »

+1 Andrew

I love full value climbs. I want to work to send those 11's
Skipping cruxes is a way of life.
dustonian
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by dustonian »

Andrew wrote: Shadow is right, yall complain about FREE new routes. Go bolt your own if you don't like the grade. I promise that I try to grade routes accurately while adhering to the "solid for the grade" philosophy. Too many gimmies at the RRG.
+1

Bitchy climbers make a great excuse not to screw with all that brushing anymore on new lines! ;)
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by climb2core »

I should have just picked Pigsteaks lines as he has kicked the RRC habit.
Andrew
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:40 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by Andrew »

climb2core wrote:I should have just picked Pigsteaks lines as he has kicked the RRC habit.
Wouldn't matter, its not like there are a bunch of people bolting, we all know who you are complaining about.
Living the dream
User avatar
One-Fall
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 12:27 am

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by One-Fall »

Andrew wrote:
I can't tell you how many times I have said this to people. I am way to tall to be grading things. The problem with being tall is that some stuff is way harder for me and some stuff is way easier. So getting the grade accurate is hard.
But I bet your grades are spot on for people of your specific physical profile.
Can't we all just get along?
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Sandbag or Fluff:

Post by climb2core »

Andrew wrote:
climb2core wrote:I should have just picked Pigsteaks lines as he has kicked the RRC habit.
Wouldn't matter, its not like there are a bunch of people bolting, we all know who you are complaining about.
I wasn't complaining. I haven't made a comment yet about a route being sand bagged. I was merely pointing out a trend I had noticed with comments in the online guidebook. And why you ladies are being so sensitive about a grade debate on RRC.com, I have no idea.
Post Reply