online guide - feature requests

Post by KD » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:59 pm

awesome! is it updated with approaches etc?

Post by KD » Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:01 am

k i just looked at it. Its cool but I am suggesting something with a bit more detail that could be printed out and like that.

Post by **woman** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:39 pm

It might be neat to look at your routes sorted by the FA...

Post by **Josephine** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:41 pm

woman wrote:It might be neat to look at your routes sorted by the FA...

that one's already on there. it's about the 9th option down "first ascent by [enter all or part of a name]"

Post by **Paul3eb** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:14 am

what do you like about the current guide?
what don't you like about it?
what page/feature do you use the most?
".." the least?

what do you like about other online guides?
what don't you like about them?

Post by KD » Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:43 pm

Corporate Whore wrote:what do you like about the current guide?
what don't you like about it?
what page/feature do you use the most?
".." the least?

what do you like about other online guides?
what don't you like about them?

Paul, I like the online guide a lot! It is way better than other ones I have used - for example Smith Rock dot com. I like that it is updated very frequently and user comments and beta are really a good feature. The geographic feature is good but I wish the maps were a bit more precise regarding crag locations. As the PRMP develops many obscure clifflines will become bolted and more precise maps will help people find them.

Post by **Danny** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 5:29 pm

I would like an option for direct sql queries. This would be the most powerful and versatile way to do searches. There could be a little faq on the basics, and links to more information on select statements etc. People could share their queries they find useful. Some of these could be incorporated into the more user friendly interface when appropriate.

Post by **Paul3eb** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:23 pm

@woman: you're talking about in your spray, yeah? no prob..
@danny: probably not going to do that exactly. the advanced gets you pretty close as it is.. beyond that is just asking for security issues.

which of these do you like best? (ignore the minor issues like colors and such.. just looking for feedback on the layout)

personally, i think i'm for c

a)

b)

c)

Post by **captain static** » Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:45 am

a or c. Not b.

Post by **elcapitan1974** » Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:46 am

Can you search for routes by length? Say I wanted to do everything 100 ft + , are you able to do this now and if not, it would be a nice advance search addition.