Page 7 of 16
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:36 pm
by rustyvasectomy
SCIN wrote:Mike, I climb these routes over and over and over. We train by hitting the Red during the week and climbing these routes. We see how many we can do in a day. I don't climb them once then never again.
hmm, but if you have the route uber wired then you aren't really qualified to grade it. I know every move on chainsaw and it feels really easy, like 11a.
but, if i got on a 12a id never done before, odds are I would have to try much harder and it would feel harder. but, both are the same difficulty.
many would argue that it is the locals that have the most flawed perception of grades. thats how bum boy became v3, after all.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:41 pm
by at58474
Lucifer 14b
Southern Smoke 14a/b
50 words left 14b
50 words right 14a/b
Supercharger 13d, not a chance for 14a
Those guys need to get some endurance before coming to the red. If the hardest move is only V6 you can't call it a 14c!!!
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:45 pm
by SCIN
Yea, totally agree on not grading routes for the "wired" feel. I don't think that's really playing into things though here with Blue Eyed and Supafly. These just really stand out as good candidates for a downgrade.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:54 pm
by the lurkist
It isn't downgrading- it is recalibration. The skew by the masses that has gone on for the last 8-10 years needs fixing. SCIN is the man for the job.
What, no one appreciated my Harper Lee reference?
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:04 am
by SCIN
The Undertow Wall at the Lode had six 5.13 lines in 1998. Guess how many it has now? Three. As Lurk said, it's recalibration. Undertow was re calibrated and nobody squealed because it was needed.
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:32 am
by clausti
SCIN wrote:The Undertow Wall at the Lode had six 5.13 lines in 1998. Guess how many it has now? Three. As Lurk said, it's recalibration. Undertow was re calibrated and nobody squealed because it was needed.
IF
-nobody squealed when it was needed.
AND
-ppl are 'squealing' now.
THEN....
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:40 am
by the lurkist
Change is always so hard, but the culture of the climbing community is nothing if not transient. Grade corrections will occur and climbers will do what they do- forget the past and live in the now. Kind of like dogs. Whatever is happening right now has always been happening and will always be happening. Not to mention that probably 50% of anyone complaining will not be here in two years time. This predictability is an endearing quality.
And by the way, you pussies, no one asked you if you liked it.
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:54 am
by gripster
wow, i can't believe i read through this entire thread. here is what I gathered, and I believe SCIN has already brought this up, but no single person is grading these routes. hmmmm......then who could be grading them then?
oh yeah, it's you! it's all of you! Correct me if I am wrong here, but aren't many of the grades in the guidebook (and I believe this is especially true of the more popular lines) derived from this website! you can cast your opinion everyone, it is a popular vote system. whether your a gumby that can barely climb 5.8, or you are crushing 14's, you get a vote! what's to complain about?
so, end of the discussion before page 7?
and as a side note, Ray your guidebook is the best I have ever seen, hands down.
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:01 am
by SCIN
Funny thing is I can't even remember how I got the original grades anyway for Blue Eyed and Supafly. For all I know I could've gotten them word of mouth and the person who told me hadn't even been on them. I hadn't even climbed the routes before I published them in the 1st edition of my guide. Do you think that as soon as I put something in paper or in the online guidebook that it's exactly what the grade is!? You should see the amount of grade changing that goes on in the online guidebook to get these routes straight. The only reason these two routes are being called out here is because someone suggested that I add a comment to a route whenever I change the grade on it. Maybe I should go back to just changing the grade without adding a comment?
All of you who are up in arms about this grade change are pretty much clueless as to how grades are determined and end up in print. THIS is the process in action. You just happen to be witnessing it. Kills me!
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:12 am
by Jeff
The wolves are always hungry.
They will jump on, fight over, and growl at anything thrown their way.
Try not to sweat it SCIN.