Page 3 of 10

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:14 am
by Alan Evil
I tried to wrap my head in that rag so I would resemble the terrorist I am but it always came out looking like a Captain hat. So I guess I'm a Terror Pirate!

Image

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:28 pm
by KD
see i yold you to tell him before it went to far. now its gonna take a megachurch full of special forces to stop him! where will we find all the blondes?

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:51 pm
by KD
i will say that of the ten major religions: megachurch-blonde, megachurch-nonblonde, billy graham, italians, black megachurch, islams - the nice kind, islams the bad kind, budda, the asian thing, and the jay oh ohs - that the islams (both kind) have the coolest hats! except for when the pope wears his rocket hat - then its the italians.

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:49 pm
by Pru
the pope is a Nazi, not a mobster.

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:49 pm
by KD
Here is the official breakdowns of the hats of the ten major religions in case there is debate about how i based my claim:

megachurch-blonde - no hats because it hides their hair

megachurch-nonblonde - sometimes hats on the kids like if its sunny or cold or they are cowboys.

billy graham - ball cap on the guys

italians - pope gets to wear the rocket hat, women used to wear kleenexs with bobby-pins but they made them stop

black megachurch - mostly pimp hats, great big women hats, or hooded sweatshirts for male youths.

islams - the nice kind - really colorful towel things on the guys - big ol black full body hat on the girls.

islams the bad kind - really colorful towel things on the guys - big ol black full body hat on the girls. - jus kinda badder looking than the group above.

budda - fat dude runs around naked mostly, sometimes wears beads or a turban thing.

the asian thing - hatless

jay oh ohs - guys wear those beenie things (black - no propeller)

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:53 pm
by Pru
US military occupation forces in Iraq suffered at least 60 combat casulties in the six days ending Nov. 20, as total casualties reached at least 61,989*.The total includes 31,690 killed or wounded by what the Pentagon classifies as "hostile" causes and 30,299 (as of Oct. 1) dead and injured from "non-hostile" causes.**

US media divert attention from the actual cost in American life and limb by routinely reporting only the total killed (3,875 as of Nov.20) and rarely mentioning the 28,530 wounded in combat. To further minimize public perception of the cost, they cover for the Pentagon by ignoring the 30,299 (as of Oct. 1)*** military victims of accidents and illness that caused death or were serious enough to require medical evacuation, although the 3,875 reported deaths include 715 (up three since Nov.14)who died from those same causes, including 130 suicides.

*This total includes 526 (up two since Nov. 10) Iraq combat casualties with homes of record in Oregon as of Nov.17. Another 57 Oregonians are combat casualties in the Afgan occupation. These figures include deaths but not injuries from "non-hostile" causes.Reported monthly by the Pentagon at http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/C ... EF_OIF.pdf

** The number of wounded is updated weekly (usually Tuesdays) by the Pentagon at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf. The dead are from Iraq Coalition Casualties http://www.icasualties.org/oif/

*** The number of injured is updated monthly by the Pentagon at
http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/C ... reason.pdf

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:59 pm
by KD
Pru wrote:the pope is a Nazi, not a mobster.
not all itialians are mobsters - in fact the "mob" isnt even real. but if it was: it would come under the sectarian part of the italian religion. aka good italians (jay oh ohs with better food) and not the other italians - that dont exist. the pope was let in by the good ones - even though hes blonde - the rocket hat still fits. (what are you gonna do?)

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:02 pm
by Pru
Comment regarding the lack of media attention to McClellen's revelation that Bush was involved in outing Valerie Plame
Where is the firebrand journalism that the venerable Washington Post demonstrated back in the 70's in serving to take down the corrupt Nixon administration? How is it possible that a story this important goes unreported in the NY Times? It's a sad commentary on the mainstream media overall. They've given this corrupt, criminal administration a virtual pass since it stepped inside the White House in 2000. It's allowed the Busheviks to lie, cheat, deceive, steal and bully with impunity. All you need to do is watch a Bush press conference in the White House press room to see just how neutered the press is. Bush is nasty, condescending, unrevealing, taunting and cavalier as he side-steps the issues and offers inane muck instead. And the press allows it. You can see the fear in their eyes, hoping that Bush doesn't publicly ridicule them, as he has done so often when he hears a tough question he doesn't particularly like. The media ought to be ashamed of itself. And now the Times seems to have joined this pathetic group.
From http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/28872

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:12 pm
by KD
Busheviks - thats funny! :)

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:13 pm
by ReachHigh
Some of my co workers piss me off from time to time, and I could win in a fight against them. Does that make me right if I beat the shit out of them.