Page 2 of 5
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:57 pm
by pigsteak
Jeff wrote:You are mentally exhausting.
+100
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:02 pm
by bcombs
This place is getting weird.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:07 pm
by Saxman
Where was the post where businesses were ranked or where one was deemed superior for all possible needs?
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:11 pm
by Crankmas
Joe, like an ordinary job, you don't get fired, you fire yourself, if you've ever been removed from a site its a good chance its for what you did and not someone else's actions... just sayin
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:16 pm
by der uber
even if she was wrong to endorse philz, which I don't see how that's the case, you still come off bad in doing this clevis.
with the increase crowds coming to the red I think more options are better than less.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:48 pm
by Saxman
Someone needs to put a gun to that misguided head and tell him to choose the bullet or counseling. Sad part is, he would probably choose the bullet. Worse, no one here would do it because we'd be too trigger happy.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:47 pm
by clif
i just gotta think that of all the private messages sent to Meadows
these are not the ones i want to read.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:56 pm
by Clevis Bitch
I'm sorry everybody. What i wanted to say was that i am a dumb redneck and I really want someone to pay attention to me .
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:28 pm
by Rags
legally, she told you not to contact her anymore. and you did.
"if you think this is harassment, then don't read it" That statement wouldn't stand up in court.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:33 pm
by clif
not to derail the importantence of what is trying to be accomplished here,
but i'm interested in the legality of email directives. do they stand up in court? isn't that what court orders are for? can i also issue demands for how i am to be treated?