Can you rate it if you haven't sent it?

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.

Can you rate it if you havent' sent it?

yes
11
20%
no
44
80%
 
Total votes: 55

Yasmeen
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:42 am

Post by Yasmeen »

That's right! Because the only reason we climb is to escape monsters and sit in huecos!
"I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory." --Paul
---
(Emails > PMs)
Canuck
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:46 pm

Post by Canuck »

umm... what if the monster climbs up after you?
rhunt
Posts: 3202
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:02 pm

Post by rhunt »

Canuck wrote:umm... what if the monster climbs up after you?
...and eats the rat instead of you?
Danny
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 7:20 pm

Post by Danny »

it's critical to estimate the monsters climbing abilities before choosing what to climb. once I underestimated ones abilities and she ate my balls before I finally escaped.
Roentgen Ray
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 5:28 pm

Post by Roentgen Ray »

The monsters aren't always as big as you might think. I was attacked by 100's of little yellow-orange spotted monsters this weekend at Funk Rock. Thankfully, the freeze Monday night did most of 'em in.
Quod me nutrit, me destruit.
hashplant5
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:33 pm

can you rate without sending?

Post by hashplant5 »

Im obviously in the minority with my opinion, but as a boulderer, I feel climbs/ problems should be rated more by technique than pump factor, only because skill is not strength, theres no such thing as a number of pullups equaling a rating. Therefore I am forced to also say that many sport climbs at the red are GENEROUSLY rated and you can totally rate without even coming close to sending......pump is not a factor !!!!
What if you just threw to...
Caspian
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 9:28 pm

Post by Caspian »

Danny wrote:it's critical to estimate the monsters climbing abilities before choosing what to climb. once I underestimated ones abilities and she ate my balls before I finally escaped.
I thought something seemed different about you
"how ironic....now he's blind after a life of enjoying being able to see."~Homer
rhunt
Posts: 3202
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:02 pm

Re: can you rate without sending?

Post by rhunt »

hashplant5 wrote:Im obviously in the minority with my opinion, but as a boulderer, I feel climbs/ problems should be rated more by technique than pump factor, only because skill is not strength, theres no such thing as a number of pullups equaling a rating. Therefore I am forced to also say that many sport climbs at the red are GENEROUSLY rated and you can totally rate without even coming close to sending......pump is not a factor !!!!
We should start a new thread then. Lets re-rate all the climbs at the Red 12a or harder by the single hardest move..ie technique..that would be interesting :roll:
"Climbing is the spice, not the meal." ~ Lurkist
Wes
Posts: 6530
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:46 pm

Post by Wes »

As a great example of what this thread is talking about, I got on Mercy for the first time yesterday. Leading it bolt-to-bolt, felt like mid 5.11. Just nice v1/v2 boulder problems the whole way. But, when I started trying to link those *easy* problems together, they all the sudden got way harder. It is one of the coolest routes I have ever done, still I don't think it is 12c though.

Wes
"There is no secret ingredient"

Po, the kung fu panda
User avatar
Artsay
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:11 pm

Post by Artsay »

I don't think it's 12c either. More like 12a.
Does he have a strange bear claw like appendage protruding from his neck? He kep petting it.
Post Reply