Update from the ladies...

Post by **zemkat** » Wed Jan 14, 2004 10:57 pm

Definitely better than the alternatives. Thanks for the suggestion, CCG!

Post by **spuzo** » Thu Jan 15, 2004 12:17 am

Pimp wrote:EEEWWWWWWU, This thread is gross ....

Pimp Ol' buddy - this could be part of your problem with the ladies....if you want a woman - you gotta want her all the time, not just the times inbetween. We might have to have a little talk next time I see you....I might even toture you with an old health book or something. Be prepared.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Jan 15, 2004 2:21 am

You see, this is what is wrong with climbing. F'ing soccer moms. Driving their freak dogs and kids to the crag in their minivans. wanting to form social clubs and bake freekin sales!
Climbing is supposed to be a bunch of social misfits not socializing with each other!
This metro-sexual,gay-assed touchy-feelly shit has gone far enough. Think about what you 'girls' are doing. You are deconstructing everything with your banter!!

Post by **ynot** » Thu Jan 15, 2004 3:28 am

Get with the times Dirt. Minivans are so 80's .They all drive suv's now.
And yes you may be on to something and its way bigger than climbing.
And you neglected to the little plastic things stuck to thier ears that make them run innocent people off the road. SUV's are the spawn of satan.

Post by **Lucinda** » Thu Jan 15, 2004 3:54 am

OK, now that your eyes are opening to the nuances of hygiene for the opposite sex while out thrashing around in the woods ponder this......did ja know that women's breasts are really modified sweat glands? be afraid, be very afraid...... course you all probably already know we all start out life as little girls

Post by **dipsi** » Fri Jan 16, 2004 5:13 am

Post by **merrick** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 11:13 pm

this looks like a decent alternative. but i wouldn't know:

http://www.thestranger.com/2003-09-18/feature.html

they need to make a device like that for santorum. of course again i wouldn't know anything about that.

Post by **canadaclimbergirl** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 1:52 pm

I don't know Merrick...

Something about not getting a period regularily... just doesn't seem right. I didn't get mine for a while when my body fat % was way low...I just didn't feel right.

I'd rather not mess around with new drugs...and just stick to what I know.

long live the KEEPER!!!! 8)

Post by **Meadows** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 3:29 pm

CCG: The fact that you're not pregnant or currently nursing (both of which halt periods) is irregular from what nature intended.

Post by **Artsay** » Thu Jan 22, 2004 4:16 pm

I actually learned a lot from that article you posted, Merrick. Thanks.

You should read it, CCG. I was thinking the same as you but after reading that article (and several others out of curiosity) I think that BC pills are just as unnatural as this. Meadows touched on something very true. From what I learned, historically a woman would have under 200 cycles in her lifetime given the amount of time she was usually pregnant/nursing. Now, since women aren't typically baby making machines anymore, the average woman has over 400 cycles! That's a HUGE difference and not "natural" in the least.