How should I feel about this?

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.
User avatar
tbwilsonky
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:38 pm

Post by tbwilsonky »

Steve wrote:My question is why bother to update the rc.com guide when there is a sweet as on-line guide right here at rrc.com?
like, duh. the only thing better than one tick list is two tick lists.
haunted.
lena_chita
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:48 pm

Post by lena_chita »

Steve wrote: My question is why bother to update the rc.com guide when there is a sweet as on-line guide right here at rrc.com?

Well, since I got singled out for this, I'll try to answer.

Completely different things, IMO. No one is using RC database as a guide for directions/finiding routes, it is too spotty, incomplete and inconsistent for it. If you look in RC database you will see that for some areas that have dozens of routes there would be maybe one or two recorded in the database, b/c that's what someone climbed and wanted to add to their log.

Most people who bother entering routes in the database on RC just like to keep an online log of routes they climbed -- since the RC database covers all areas, not just the Red. Entering a new route in a database doesn't give you weight, credence, or anything whatsoever. The information about who entered any given route in the database is there in the route description, and it is possible to find all the routes that any specific person entered, but it is buried deep in the user profiles.




Red is probably unique in terms of up-to-date online guidebook. Most areas don't have that. In most areas the routes that go up since the last edition of the guidebook are word-of-mouth sort of thing, until the next print edition comes out.

So when I initially added some routes to the RC database-- either for the NRG, or RRG-- they were routes from a published guidebook, and everyone just seemed to copy the route descriptions from the paper hardcopy into the RC database. I did not think too much of it at the time.

But when it came to putting in a route that was not in a published guidebook, I had a lightbulb moment and thought: "wait, it isn't right to copy unpublished route information from the online guide"-- that's when I switched to just putting "see redriverclimbing for details" in route description.
User avatar
p0bray01
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:05 pm

Post by p0bray01 »

take em to Yosemite.... hang em by their toes, smear honey on them and watch the action begin!!
"The Mountains are my church and climbing is how I worship" - Tommy Caldwell
User avatar
clif
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:24 pm

Post by clif »

and if she puts on a good show i'd buy a subscription
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Post by ynot »

get mr. T to throw mohawk grenedes at them.
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

RC.com I understand is owned by a company (it was bought from the person who owned it originally) so I assume profits are involved. I would bet they would take concern with your work being transferred to their site. You are published and it says so when we open the online guide.

Ebay will even remove copied and pasted text/pictures that are not authorized for use for fear of copyright infringement.
gripster
Posts: 469
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:43 am

Post by gripster »

clif wrote:why would a link not suffice anyway?
ditto
User avatar
Josephine
Posts: 2216
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:38 pm

Post by Josephine »

:-(
"Unthinkably good things can happen, even late in the game." ~ Under the Tuscan Sun
User avatar
p0bray01
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:05 pm

Post by p0bray01 »

I like the Mohawk grenade idea....
"The Mountains are my church and climbing is how I worship" - Tommy Caldwell
Post Reply