RRC Archives

Sandy Berger stole highly classified documents on terrorism from the national archives. Secreted then out of the building by stuffing them in his pants and socks, hid them on a construction site next door, then returned after dark to pick them up. He then took the documents to his home where he destroyed them.

Now he's been rewarded with a position as an advisor to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Wonder who he was protecting by destroying the documents?

You know, if you or I had done something like this our asses would be rotting in jail.

Of course he was rewarded...he knew how to keep the boss out of trouble.

I still don't understand how Hillary can run for president. I thought you could only serve two terms?

are you trying to say that there are high end democratic types that are not on the level too I just don't believe it

Oh, and the report I read said that all the original documents were returned. He only destroyed what appeared to be copies.

Copies? originals? none the less, he removed sensitive information, from a government agency, without permission, and destroyed them! Not only that, he was about as smooth as rough grit sandpaper when he did it, what an idiot. All that trouble to steal copies??? He either pulled off the crime of the century right under our noses or he's the second biggest dumbass in Hillarys clan. you want a conspiracy, start with this guy and those documents. Either way, no worse than GW'S antics of late! I so wish we had a third party, The "Common Party",
you know, like common sense, common men, common women, doing what we need for a change and not them.....

Why steal and destroy copies? Because of the handwritten notes in the margins of certain copies. The left couldn't blame 9/ll on Bush until they destroyed evidence of the Clinton's negligence in the matter. Neither party did anything like an admirable job in dealing with the known threat of Bin Laden and his scum.

I am sure that document stealing and destroying occures all the time in washington, that would explain why berger's attitude was so cavaleir about the whole situation. Conspiracy? Sure, he was covering some ass (pun intended). It happens all the time.

They should just use those $2000.00 shredders we are paying our taxes for.

L K Day wrote:...The left couldn't blame 9/ll on Bush until they destroyed evidence of the Clinton's negligence in the matter. ...

What?!? Are you now going to say that Bush was putting a lot of attention, funding, and support behind anti-terrorism before 9/11? Are you really going to say that? Despite all the evidence?

Bush gutted the budget of the anti-terrorism task force Clinton set up.
Bush ignored his advisors on terroristic threats.
Bush ignored his security briefings. Supposedly he was all but asleep.

Are you really going to try to portray the spoiled fucker that took office in 2000 as some kind of victim of a conspiracy?