911 conspiracy?

Movies, music, food, blood, dogs, Horatio.....
Crankmas
Posts: 3961
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 5:24 pm

911 conspiracy?

Post by Crankmas »

has 6 years changed anyones' mind yes or no concerning 911? any nagging thoughts or new perspectives?
User avatar
krampus
Posts: 3933
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:31 am

Post by krampus »

definitely a conspiracy. I am not usually into these sorts of things but there are just too many weird things about it to believe the explanations at face value.
How you compare may not be as important as to whom you are compared
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Post by Saxman »

I don't know about the twin towers, but the crap with the plane and the pentagon is complete bullshit. The profile of the hole and the profile of the plane are so far apart it is not even funny. Of course, if the pentagon is fishy, all of it by extension must be.
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
gunslnga
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:31 am

Post by gunslnga »

And sometimes we are presented with things so far fetched and unbeliveable....that they're true!!! :shock:
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....
Crankmas
Posts: 3961
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by Crankmas »

has a portion of the plane that hit the pentagon ever been scene or presented?
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Post by Saxman »

Nope. Two Jet engines weighing several hundered tons each, simply folded in on the wings, into the fuselage, and went through that hole. Yeah, right. People don't care and the media are a bunch of morons.
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
User avatar
Saxman
Posts: 3088
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 7:10 pm

Post by Saxman »

Oh, and the fuselage/wing and engine/wing interfaces are the strongest most reinforced parts of the plane. You didn't see the wings of the two planes that hit the towers fold in did you?
The theory of evolution is just as stupid as the theories of gravity and electromagnetism.
captain static
Posts: 2438
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:05 pm

Post by captain static »

My mind has not been changed as I had questions from the get go. Immediately upon seeing it on TV that fateful day I stated that this is a State sponsored military operation. What State was doing the sponsoring I do not know. I am a licensed civil engineer and do know that buildings on fire that were not hit by planes (WTC7) do not collapse suddenly in the manner of a controlled demolition. I am not the only building professional who has serious questions about these collapses: http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html
"Be responsible for your actions and sensitive to the concerns of other visitors and land managers. ... Your reward is the opportunity to climb in one of the most beautiful areas in this part of the country." John H. Bronaugh
Crankmas
Posts: 3961
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by Crankmas »

it ain't passing the sniff test with me and I agree its the collapse of WTC7 that causes considerable doubt that something wasn't coordinated, can you say "Lets Pull It? I knew you could
overhung
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 9:18 pm

Post by overhung »

Saxman wrote:Oh, and the fuselage/wing and engine/wing interfaces are the strongest most reinforced parts of the plane. You didn't see the wings of the two planes that hit the towers fold in did you?
I was stationed at the Pentagon from 89 to 93, and went on several of the tours while I was there. I remember them mentioning specific construction materials and a design which is intended to survive a nuclear blast. If it is as strudy as they claim, it's not farfetched to believe that the wings folded.
I've had just about enough of this shit.
Post Reply