Cheney Was Drunk
Cheney Was Drunk
I've had just about enough of this shit.
Sounds to me like a few laws were broken, and everyone tried to hush it up... like most things in this administration. Let's see, in the presence of Secret Service agents, our Vice took it upon himself to get drunk, shoot someone, cover it up, and we shouldn't be concerned? I can guarantee you if one of us was caught in the same position we'd probably be in trouble.
I've had just about enough of this shit.
Liars liars pants on fire...
eh, who am I kidding. These people own the law. Cheney could've been shitfaced drunk and intentionally shot what's his fuck and we'd never know. They'll destroy the evidence and expect us to accept what they say as the "gospel" truth. Oh, and we're supposed to believe they didn't intentionally alter evidence for war with Iraq. Oops! Hey! What if one of the secret service agents shows up dead soon? Huh?!? Oh, it just happened...
eh, who am I kidding. These people own the law. Cheney could've been shitfaced drunk and intentionally shot what's his fuck and we'd never know. They'll destroy the evidence and expect us to accept what they say as the "gospel" truth. Oh, and we're supposed to believe they didn't intentionally alter evidence for war with Iraq. Oops! Hey! What if one of the secret service agents shows up dead soon? Huh?!? Oh, it just happened...
[size=75]You are as bad as Alan, and even he hits the mark sometimes. -charlie
"Not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill[/size]
"Not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill[/size]
Quit wasting time on Cheney's hunting accident. Hunting is dangerous - accidents happen, duh. Are they lying about some aspects of the incident? Yeah, sure - it's just instinct for Cheney and his crew as it was for Nixon. Whatever.
Talk about something important - like the fact that the Bush administration's foolish decision to invade Iraq, and their subsequent corruption and incompetence is leading to an all out civil war there. Just for anyone who is fuzzy on why a civil war in Iraq is bad for the US: Step 1: middle easter/central asian nation is invaded, and the superpower bungles the occupation (USSR invades Afghanistan) Step 2: Superpower's incompetence and cruelty deeply damages said superpower (see USSR/Afghanistan) Step 3:bungled occupation leads to civil war, superpower withdraws (guess who?) Step 4: instability during civil war creates opportunity for terrorist organization to establish major base of operations (see: al Qaeda in Afghanistan) Step 5: terrorist organization attacks the US (see: 9/11)
lather, rinse, repeat?
oh yeah, I'm soooo sure that the leaders in Iran are just quaking in their radioactive boots with fear that the great, fearful US military will invade... (yes, the US military is the most powerful in the world, but if the US had focused on the critical work being done in Afghanistan in dealing with the people who actually attacked the US on 9/11, and not gone on this wild goose chase in Iraq, then we really would be able to intimidate Iran and North Korea.)
Bush and Cheney's bad decisions have consequences. And they're a lot worse than some buckshot in the face.
Talk about something important - like the fact that the Bush administration's foolish decision to invade Iraq, and their subsequent corruption and incompetence is leading to an all out civil war there. Just for anyone who is fuzzy on why a civil war in Iraq is bad for the US: Step 1: middle easter/central asian nation is invaded, and the superpower bungles the occupation (USSR invades Afghanistan) Step 2: Superpower's incompetence and cruelty deeply damages said superpower (see USSR/Afghanistan) Step 3:bungled occupation leads to civil war, superpower withdraws (guess who?) Step 4: instability during civil war creates opportunity for terrorist organization to establish major base of operations (see: al Qaeda in Afghanistan) Step 5: terrorist organization attacks the US (see: 9/11)
lather, rinse, repeat?
oh yeah, I'm soooo sure that the leaders in Iran are just quaking in their radioactive boots with fear that the great, fearful US military will invade... (yes, the US military is the most powerful in the world, but if the US had focused on the critical work being done in Afghanistan in dealing with the people who actually attacked the US on 9/11, and not gone on this wild goose chase in Iraq, then we really would be able to intimidate Iran and North Korea.)
Bush and Cheney's bad decisions have consequences. And they're a lot worse than some buckshot in the face.
Bacon is meat candy.
Yeah and Clinton did'nt have sex with Monica???or was'nt directly involved in Whitewater, I could go on, but why bother. I'm not arguing whos administration or President is better, only that this goe's on no matter whos in the Oval Office.overhung wrote:Sounds to me like a few laws were broken, and everyone tried to hush it up... like most things in this administration..
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....
Here's a big difference: Clinton only made a few mistakes that cost American lives. Notably, giving bin laden away.
Bush, on the other hand, seems to make bad decisions as a rule.
Can you tell me that you 'stand by your president' when he wants to SELL OUR PORTS TO UNITED ARAB EMERATES!? (sp?)
I head a great bit about this:
"how old do you have to be to realilze this is a really bad idea?"
"Lets ask little bobby! Hey bobby, I have a question for you. Is it a good idea to allow another country to run our ports?
"I don't know!"
"Well, bobby, let's say that this was actually a bank that pays money to Terrorists that attack us."
"Ph, that would be a bad idea."
"How old are you Bobby?"
"eight/"
"thank you Bobby."
Bush, on the other hand, seems to make bad decisions as a rule.
Can you tell me that you 'stand by your president' when he wants to SELL OUR PORTS TO UNITED ARAB EMERATES!? (sp?)
I head a great bit about this:
"how old do you have to be to realilze this is a really bad idea?"
"Lets ask little bobby! Hey bobby, I have a question for you. Is it a good idea to allow another country to run our ports?
"I don't know!"
"Well, bobby, let's say that this was actually a bank that pays money to Terrorists that attack us."
"Ph, that would be a bad idea."
"How old are you Bobby?"
"eight/"
"thank you Bobby."
"Before enlightenment, chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood, carry water."
tomdarch wrote: Talk about something important - like the fact that the Bush administration's foolish decision to invade Iraq, and their subsequent corruption and incompetence is leading to an all out civil war there.
(see USSR/Afghanistan) Step 3:bungled occupation leads to civil war, superpower withdraws (guess who?).
How about the fact that the majority of the country was suppressed by the small party of Saddams Elite Baathist party and now once usurped they are struggling to hold onto the fleeting glory/power/wealth they once had.
The majority Shiites are now excersising they're freedom and the Baathists are trying to start an uprise because they are no longer in power and are afraid that they will hold no power in the future. the strength of the insurgents is backed by Baathist blood money. The way we are handling things on the ground there has nothing to do with this civil war. We have to let the newly trained military handle this with as little assistance from us so it won't seem that we are taking sides.
I was around in the 80's I followed the Afghan war as close as possible,
I don't remeber a civil war. I do remember that the Russians invaded with the help of the Afghan Goverment and it's Military. I remember it was the usual Communist domino tactic to aquire more land and spread Communism. I remember that the Mujahideen was all but beat and retreating to the mountains of pakistan and such. I remember when the U.S sent CIA spooks and boat loads of Stinger missles to the Muj and when they gained air supeiority, they pushed the Commie invader out of there country. I just don't see your conclusion of Commie occupation to American reconstruction after winning a war???? I'm pretty sure the iron boot of Socialisism would have been installed at the tip of an AK-47, rather than through elections and Democracy.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....
Huggybone states....
Here's a big difference: Clinton only made a few mistakes that cost American lives. Notably, giving bin laden away.
Bush, on the other hand, seems to make bad decisions as a rule.
Can you tell me that you 'stand by your president' when he wants to SELL OUR PORTS TO UNITED ARAB EMERATES!? (sp?)
Gunslnga says in retort....
I was not defending Bush, just stating that all Administrations lie,steal, and kill, not just our current one, I heard it from my grandpa, I heard it from my dad and now I hear it for myself. It's all the same.
However, to say clinton made a few mistakes, or a few american lives, letting Bin laden go caused us 3000 in one day, thats more than this whole war so far.....
Huggybone, I got a book for you on this very subject, it's called"An End To Evil" by David Frum & Richard Perle. You probably won't like it, but it is a Non-Fiction book choc full o facts on our current situation with the "War On Terror". It has a good timeline from 93 up to mid to late 2004. It opened my eyes on a lot of things, lot's of neat little facts you might have known but wanted to forget...... Oh, and I don't want the U.A.E owning shit in our country let alone any ports!!!!!!
Here's a big difference: Clinton only made a few mistakes that cost American lives. Notably, giving bin laden away.
Bush, on the other hand, seems to make bad decisions as a rule.
Can you tell me that you 'stand by your president' when he wants to SELL OUR PORTS TO UNITED ARAB EMERATES!? (sp?)
Gunslnga says in retort....
I was not defending Bush, just stating that all Administrations lie,steal, and kill, not just our current one, I heard it from my grandpa, I heard it from my dad and now I hear it for myself. It's all the same.
However, to say clinton made a few mistakes, or a few american lives, letting Bin laden go caused us 3000 in one day, thats more than this whole war so far.....
Huggybone, I got a book for you on this very subject, it's called"An End To Evil" by David Frum & Richard Perle. You probably won't like it, but it is a Non-Fiction book choc full o facts on our current situation with the "War On Terror". It has a good timeline from 93 up to mid to late 2004. It opened my eyes on a lot of things, lot's of neat little facts you might have known but wanted to forget...... Oh, and I don't want the U.A.E owning shit in our country let alone any ports!!!!!!
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.....