Of fireworks, juvenile acts, dogs and the land.

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
User avatar
rjackson
Posts: 928
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 3:26 pm

Of fireworks, juvenile acts, dogs and the land.

Post by rjackson »

Everyone has an opinion, but what are the official positions of the varied organizations and owners of the crags where we climb on these issues?

National Parks and Forrest Service. RRGCC. Muir Valley. Private Owners. State Law.

I am not looking to start arguments, bond with like minded individuals or create a monster...simply looking for information.

Juveniles feel free to tell me where to go, enlightened individuals can point me in a direction, and those in the know should share.

Thanks.
Pick myself up, stop lookin' back.
Grand Funk Railroad
squeezindlemmon
Posts: 1452
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 7:02 pm

Post by squeezindlemmon »

FYI, Muir Valley has a leash law in effect.
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our mind. ~Bob Marley
User avatar
Artsay
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 3:11 pm

Post by Artsay »

PMRP rules - "All dogs must be on a leash or under control of their owners."
Does he have a strange bear claw like appendage protruding from his neck? He kep petting it.
DuppyC
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:53 pm

Post by DuppyC »

dogs must be leashed or under verbal command in national forests.

However, I am still waiting on a legit M-80 offer.
"No one has to do something he doesn't want to do for the rest of his life. But then again, if that's what you end up doing, by all means convince yourself that you had to do it; you'll have lots of company." HST
haas
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 5:06 pm

Post by haas »

Most national parks out west do not allow dogs period, RMNP, Zion, Yosemite. Most state parks out west have leash laws with hefty fines, especially Eldo
Crankmas
Posts: 3961
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by Crankmas »

my advise is to kill a lawyer, they are over represented in govt and thus pass stupid ass laws after stupid ass laws, piss poor legislation and generally suck in all matters related to life as a K9 or human being
Christian
Posts: 1722
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 1:57 pm

Post by Christian »

It was my understanding that under the new "get tough on everything" criminal code no one is allowed to be within 1000 feet of themselves. If they are their charge will be "enhance" by an upward shift in the felony charge and a corresponding "enhancement" of the sentence from life without parole to "life with Oprah Whinfrey".
I try to be a good man but all that comes
of trying is I feel more guilty.
Ikkyu
kirker
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:05 pm

Post by kirker »

I started to express my dissatisfaction with some of the dog leash laws in and around the Red, but quickly erased after reading it. I realized that few people truly enjoy the site of animals enjoying themselves. Most just enjoy the thought of owning a dog, cat ect, but block out the thought of how stupid it is to tie them up. Those of you who understand thankyou, and those that don't ask yourself if the local animals that inhabit the areas we climb and hike wished we were tied up.
kris
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:27 pm

Post by kris »

gullwing wrote:Those of you who understand thankyou, and those that don't ask yourself if the local animals that inhabit the areas we climb and hike wished we were tied up.
Good Point!
Spragwa
Posts: 3650
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 4:05 pm

Post by Spragwa »

I doubt it's just the woodland creatures who wish that I was tied up...many people would prefer that I were muzzled as well.

Fortunately, my owner doesn't care about public opinion. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jesus only knows that she tries too hard. She's only trying to keep the sky from falling.

-Everlast
Post Reply