Everyone has an opinion, but what are the official positions of the varied organizations and owners of the crags where we climb on these issues?
National Parks and Forrest Service. RRGCC. Muir Valley. Private Owners. State Law.
I am not looking to start arguments, bond with like minded individuals or create a monster...simply looking for information.
Juveniles feel free to tell me where to go, enlightened individuals can point me in a direction, and those in the know should share.
Thanks.
Of fireworks, juvenile acts, dogs and the land.
Of fireworks, juvenile acts, dogs and the land.
Pick myself up, stop lookin' back.
Grand Funk Railroad
Grand Funk Railroad
-
- Posts: 1452
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 7:02 pm
dogs must be leashed or under verbal command in national forests.
However, I am still waiting on a legit M-80 offer.
However, I am still waiting on a legit M-80 offer.
"No one has to do something he doesn't want to do for the rest of his life. But then again, if that's what you end up doing, by all means convince yourself that you had to do it; you'll have lots of company." HST
It was my understanding that under the new "get tough on everything" criminal code no one is allowed to be within 1000 feet of themselves. If they are their charge will be "enhance" by an upward shift in the felony charge and a corresponding "enhancement" of the sentence from life without parole to "life with Oprah Whinfrey".
I try to be a good man but all that comes
of trying is I feel more guilty.
Ikkyu
of trying is I feel more guilty.
Ikkyu
I started to express my dissatisfaction with some of the dog leash laws in and around the Red, but quickly erased after reading it. I realized that few people truly enjoy the site of animals enjoying themselves. Most just enjoy the thought of owning a dog, cat ect, but block out the thought of how stupid it is to tie them up. Those of you who understand thankyou, and those that don't ask yourself if the local animals that inhabit the areas we climb and hike wished we were tied up.