Victory whips
Victory whips
Since the other thread is locked, I would like to say something here. First and formemost, Rick is obviously free to set any guidelines for the land he owns, and I totally respect that. I will follow those guidelines when I climb at muir. This thread is not to challange that directly. Rather, it is because I do not believe that there is any measurable harm to the rock and hardware caused by taking intental falls from the anchors. I am not an engineer, I haven't bolted a bunch of lines, and I am not all that bright. But, I have, with my own eyes, seen sooooo many falls (intentional and otherwise) in the red that if a fall was even a little, tiny bit bad for the bolt, many would have failed long ago.
"There is no secret ingredient"
Po, the kung fu panda
Po, the kung fu panda
I just get more and more impressed with how the Webers continue to create a safe and fun climbing environment. If you don't like climbing in a place that has incredible maps, trails, routes, and hardworking people actively maintaining a high standard of climbing, there are a ton of other places you can go.
Does he have a strange bear claw like appendage protruding from his neck? He kep petting it.
i could care less about the hardware or the rock. i care only that the weber's don't want me to take those falls, have spent thousands of their own dollars to set up an incredible place to climb, and have humbly and graciously opened up the land for all climbers to enjoy. debate about the bolts if you will but there's no question about the integrity of the weber's intents and desires.
and great loves will one day have to part -smashing pumpkins