if the forest service said we'd be allowed to climb and bolt on fs land but only if we didn't use chalk (and obviously avoided arch sites), would you be for it or against it?
ps: as far as i know, this isn't the main point of contention with regards to access in the area.. i'm just curious if people would make the sacrifice if it were ever offered.
chalk ban
-
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 7:26 pm
i am a little full..
i'm just curious. i've heard about chalk bans elsewhere and i wonder how well they would be received in this area if it were ever proposed. i'm always curious about what sacrifices people are or aren't willing to make.
i'm just curious. i've heard about chalk bans elsewhere and i wonder how well they would be received in this area if it were ever proposed. i'm always curious about what sacrifices people are or aren't willing to make.
and great loves will one day have to part -smashing pumpkins
seems to me that if the FS bans it we don't have much choice now do we?
looks like people will be doing more winter climbing.
looks like people will be doing more winter climbing.
I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
- Robert McCloskey
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
- Emo Philips
- Robert McCloskey
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
- Emo Philips
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 3:03 am