Lowering on anchors.
- milspecmark
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:46 pm
Lowering on anchors.
So I read 2 articles today on facebook. One from American Alpine club and one from the RRG Fixed gear initiative. Both are recommending us lower from the anchors now rather than Rappelling. I have been climbing in the Red for about 8 years now and I have always heard it is more ethical to Rap than Lower. I just wanted to get your all thoughts on this issue. Do you Rap or lower?
- Rotarypwr345704
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:27 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
This topic hasn't been beaten like the proverbial dead horse.
I fell for the everyone-shut-up-and-ill-donate-money scheme. -Ray Ellington, guidebook gawd
My name is Sam Douglass and I love to pose for photo shoots holding on to a jug with only one hand (and no feet!) with my best friend Ian.
My name is Sam Douglass and I love to pose for photo shoots holding on to a jug with only one hand (and no feet!) with my best friend Ian.
Re: Lowering on anchors.
To say it is more ethical to rappel on a one pitch route is completely stupid when quicklinks are a dollar and easily replaceable.
- milspecmark
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:46 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
I dont worry about the cost as much as I worry about people actually keeping up with it.
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:48 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
"People" include you. Do your part to make sure the anchors are good on the routes you climb. Even if just a small minority of people does that, everything is fine, because those chains can take thousands of lowerings before they become dangerous. So ~1 person in a thousand carrying a couple of extra quicklinks in their bag is good. Be that person.milspecmark wrote:I don't worry about the cost as much as I worry about people actually keeping up with it.
Re: Lowering on anchors.
quicklinks or the missing link?
training is for people who care, i have a job.
-
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:05 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
Don't you just love revisionism
"Be responsible for your actions and sensitive to the concerns of other visitors and land managers. ... Your reward is the opportunity to climb in one of the most beautiful areas in this part of the country." John H. Bronaugh
-
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:48 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
Well, when the revisionism is in the right direction... The ability to change your mind in the face of solid reasoning/facts is a rather valuable, and rare, thing these day. I'm all for celebrating it.captain static wrote:Don't you just love revisionism
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:52 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
Climbing in the Red almost a decade and you really don't know what the general consensus is yet?
This topic has been beat to death several times already but to answer your question I lower 98% of the time. It's easier, faster, and generally safer.
This topic has been beat to death several times already but to answer your question I lower 98% of the time. It's easier, faster, and generally safer.
- climb2core
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm
Re: Lowering on anchors.
This is not revisionism. This is evolution based upon best practice to mitigate risk. Less people decking or dying beats out the traditionalists need to preserve a piece of metal.captain static wrote:Don't you just love revisionism