Arizona

Innocent subjects that took a turn for the worst.
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Post by ynot »

anticlmber wrote:really, yu live in a world full of fears, fear of:
being shot, being jobless, being mugged, being passed over, being raped, being labled, being dropped, being injured, being pulled over, being told what to do, flying, of sharks, of the dark, being thrown in jail/prison, sitting next to a fat smelly person, failure, not being saved, being a bad parent, taken advantage of, and the list goes on and on.

you have no rights, we just have a looser enslavement that we feel makes us "free" and at the same time we have less than most others and more BS than the rest.

god bless this fucking mess
works out great for the insurance companies
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
User avatar
Boonda
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:39 am

Post by Boonda »

Come here anti, let me give you a hug.
Wanna have an adventure?
anticlmber
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 12:34 am

Post by anticlmber »

fear of hugs, commitment, truth, lies, and all the stuff you haven't even begun to realize you should fear.
Like me on facebook but hate me in real life
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

I say let em all stay, but make em pay into fed taxes, social security and the rest if they use the infrastructure of the country. and fine the employers if they don't.
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
User avatar
DriskellHR
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:34 pm

Post by DriskellHR »

pigsteak wrote:I say let em all stay, but make em pay into fed taxes, social security and the rest if they use the infrastructure of the country. and fine the employers if they don't.
I second that, I have kicked entire crews off my job site because the employees who were all "legal" when all in fact were illegal.
Last edited by DriskellHR on Fri May 07, 2010 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"....... Be sure to linger......." Mike Tucker
User avatar
Clevis Hitch
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:10 pm

Post by Clevis Hitch »

I got friends who are illegal and I came to the conclusion that the system is set up to take advantage of the poor working class. Think about it...From antibellum to the present day there has always exhisted a way for undocumented or slaves to work for slave wages. Its big business in collusion with goverment to provide cheap labor so that we as Americans can compete on the world stage. The problem is that we've become so rich that even our poor enjoy a standard of living that is the envy of the rest of the world. Daily comforts that you'll find in any trailer in Kentucky. Color television, Refrigeration,hot and cold running water,flush toilet and on demand lighting not to mention public septic systems, side walks paved roads, street lights cops that don't shake you down. A goverment that we can hold their feet to the fire when wwe need to.
All this was built on the backs of the oppressed. Don't get me wrong I don't believe in this "cradle-to-the-grave" mentality of the socialists but I do believe in a fair shake.

The goverment has made it too hard to go through the legal system as a mexican or spanish speaking south American. In effect creating a permanent under class. The greedy Big-Ag businesses stand in line to hire undocumented (read;cheap/disposible) labor. No taxes taken out. No FICA payments. No workers comp so if they get hurt then they are S.O.L.
If you give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. If you set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
Xtant
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:33 pm

Post by Xtant »

Boonda wrote:I'm a big believer in doing things the legal way. I believe if you want to live in a country and reap the benefits then it's the responsible thing to do it right. America is an amazing country with endless opportunities. The problem with this bill, I feel, is the openess of the term "reasonable suspicion". The law requiring appropriate documentation has been around for awhile, this addition of law enforcement being able to approach ANY individual they deem suspcious is where things start to get waffley. It's not just people who are breaking the law that can be approached. It's any citizen/person/etc... I just worry that the whole pursuit of happiness aspect of our rights is starting to be overlooked. My ideal country isn't one where people are constanly living in fear.
that's not the law. That was never the law. Initially it talked about legal contact or something. Basically meant if they were breaking the law in some way. If law enforcement was talking to you about a law that you broke, they could ask to see your visa.

The amendment that was passed clarified that even further.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I'd think if you were off climbing in Britain and you got pulled over for a DUI on the way to climb that they might ask to see your passport.

This law is no different.
Sure is a lot of fun while you're doing it...
User avatar
Boonda
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:39 am

Post by Boonda »

What do you mean that was never the law Xtant? The law initially allowed officers to approach anyone they had suspicion of, whether they were breaking the law or not. That's why they had to go through the amending process, and now they specified that officers can only ask for paper work if the accused was committing a crime.

The unsure part now is it allowable only when the person is breaking the law (traffic offenses, robbery, etc...) or whenever police are called to a scene (loud parties).
Wanna have an adventure?
Xtant
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:33 pm

Post by Xtant »

The original law they passed said a cop could ask for your documents if they had "lawful contact" with that person. That was meaning a traffic stop, an arrest, called for a disturbance. All those things cops do. If there was no probable cause for another offense, then there would not be "lawful contact."

Critics were worried that was too vague so the amendment actually defined lawful contact.

The amendment changed nothing about the original. It just spelled out more details to shut critics up...

Have you read the bill or are you merely spitting up talking points you've heard critics discussing?

The original bill: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/sb1070s.pdf

It never said reasonable suspicion of being an alien was the probable cause.
Sure is a lot of fun while you're doing it...
User avatar
Clevis Hitch
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:10 pm

Post by Clevis Hitch »

I saw this video of these cops chasing a van. The van wrecked and like thirty people jumped out and scattered. From what I understand about it. If Immigration wasn't there when the obvious illegals were caught then the officers couldn't make an obvious arrest of illegals.
If you give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. If you set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
Post Reply