Page 1 of 3
what do you think?
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:43 pm
by Crankmas
Recent issue of R&I mag has a short bit on Steph Davis and basejumping but includes the news that both she and hubby Dean Potter lost significant sponsors ( I'm assuming Patagonia) due to the fallout from the arch climb done by Dean in Utah, I think Steph was shooting photos and got the hammer for such. Harsh? appropriate given the access issue? who cares about those wankers and patagucci anyway?
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:50 pm
by Winterstorm
who cares about those wankers and patagucci anyway?
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:55 pm
by Lateralus
Dean's a cool guy, never really talked to steff much. Patagonia seems to give a crap about the environment and makes pretty good clothing/gear.. who give a crap what R&I thinks?
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:22 pm
by p0bray01
It may have been the issue that Patagucci had to take action somehow and that was the outcome. I mean Dean prob should have thought a little before doing it, but who knows....
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:00 pm
by Myke Dronez
is it Patagucci or Pradagonia?
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:19 pm
by der uber
I like Poopuponya
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:49 pm
by john e aragon
He shouldn't have taken the film crew with him. Just done the route, kept his mouth shut and none of this would have happened. He deserves what he gets.
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:24 pm
by ynot
good point
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:29 pm
by KD
der uber wrote:I like Poopuponya
lol i can relate to that! I once made a poopuponya while in patagonia - strange place to pooh
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:38 pm
by MSMITH
Sounds like potter is an arrogant prick and Patapooponyagucci realized that he isn't the kind of dude they want representing them, nor anyone that associates with him.