RRC Archives

Well, you killed it for me. I can't thank you enough. And thanks for the lesson on doing research in the youtube era. Cheers!

I still think it was cheney

That guy is clearly evil as fuck.

Sorry folks! I been busy as heck, and it will take a bit for me to respond adequately. I have to dig up information and links. But, for right now, if you watch that video and you think that John Gross is not denying that there was molten metal (Whether he says steel or metal), you are really, really very far gone, or covering up. But, even if it was aluminum (which it wasn't- need to find links for that) how would you account for the temperatures? Those temps could not have come from jet fuel and office fires. But, after I respond to this in full, I think I'll leave this topic behind. There are so many others to cover... Have you watched this yet? You really should.... Check out the suggested links also, Please. Thank you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDHN1gBk ... re=related

dustonian wrote:That guy is clearly evil as fuck.

Fully agreed! Thanks for chiming in.

This is really something, and has some great Cheney footage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgfzqulvhlQ 6:27

Sometimes freedom of speech can suck

climb2core wrote:Sometimes freedom of speech can suck

Agreed, but it beats the alternative.

Pretty entertaining to see truthmiracle shut down so well. We all watched your stupid video(best easiest evidence you could find) and its clear as day Gross is denying molten STEEL not molten metal which makes all the difference in the world.... apparently you can't understand that. As the evidence show aluminum is molten around 1000 degrees right? How are you saying the office fires, combined with jet fuel, could never produce those temperatures... An oven gets to 400 pretty easily, im sure house fires an even get to 1000 degrees yet you dont think a giant building full of paper and wood that has been doused in jet fuel could burn hot enough to melt aluminum? Your arguments and evidence are full of holes man. Everyone just showed you whats wrong with your "molten steel" arguement, which one are you going to throw out next?

And did you really just post a video of that dumb redneck? Obviously he has no clue what he is talking about no matter which side he sits on so his video is irrelevant. Please truthmiracle id love to see what "evidence" you produce next that it was an inside job.

I repeat myself. I am no "truther", I don't follow any particular theory, but anyone who feels comfortable with final explanation of 9/11 and feels as though they know the whole truth is a damn fool. at least truthmiracle is trying to understand.

krampus wrote:I repeat myself. I am no "truther", I don't follow any particular theory, but anyone who feels comfortable with final explanation of 9/11 and feels as though they know the whole truth is a damn fool. at least truthmiracle is trying to understand.

Really? Truther is trying to make the evidence fit his hypothesis. He is not searching for the Truth... he is selectively choosing the evidence that supports his hypothesis. He is not trying to understand, he is peddling lies.