Page 8 of 13
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:04 pm
by Spragwa
I'm not going to give you a list of people who are chosing another route. I can honestly tell you that I know of four former RRGCC donors who are giving to the SCC now. It's not my business to tell you who all is doing that. Why is that innuendo? I'm telling you what is happening, despite my better judgment. Look, here it is again, the famous bashing of the poster who says something that you don't want to hear.
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:07 pm
by Danny
Johnny wrote:I'll give up on responding now.
Hey, does that mean you will now have time to take me to your super secret crag
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:19 pm
by SCIN
Johnny wrote:Ray,
I don't see any conspiracy here. I thought I have been very supportive of your online guide. Nobody at the RRGCC ever gave me any grief about it either. We had discussed many times about trying to use your site for RRGCC information, but early on, you rebuffed us. Later, you capitulated somewhat, but the monitoring of the posts wasn't sufficient for a PG audience that the RRGCC official site would have to adhere to. I think we all admired your abilities and wished we could have used your talents.
I also see the direction to post at the RRGCC site as simply a way to address serious questions with direct and serious responses. I don't think there is any intent at all to take users from your site. The RRGCC has been widely criticized for not getting out information. The site is a way to do that. It's not conducive to a chat room like experience, and will never try to be. It has never come up at a board meeting that I'm aware of that the RRGCC is worried about how many hits the site gets. It's simply a tool to answer questions as quickly as possible to a wide audience and nothing more.
I understand what you meant about answering questions now.
Gretchen's attitude toward this site leadsme to believe that it is seen as laughable and non-informative by the RRGCC. It's too bad that she is a ranking member of the RRGCC because her comments reflect the organization as a whole. You guys really need to get rid of her. She is damaging the organization in many ways. This thread is a prime example.
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:43 pm
by Gretchen
Poor Ray, I hurt your feelings. I'm sorry, NOT. I have to say that I have a full on allergic reaction to a few of you and my side effect is pure sarcasm. Anyone know acure??? I noticed this started awhile back then I don't look at the board for awhile and the tick comes back when I start looking again.. HMMMM.
Also for your diagnosis: schizophrenia. And there are medications that can help you manage your situation, sorry no cure to date.
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:49 pm
by SCIN
Gretchen - Since you've just admitted that you come on the board and purposely start shit with me, the site owner, I think I'll ban your ass. See ya bitch.
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:49 pm
by Spragwa
Man, I think she's possessed by demons. I recommend an exorcism.
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:02 am
by Spragwa
Holy crap. SCIN banned her. I'm so happy I'm about to pee myself.
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:18 am
by Jeff
I can't believe you guys.
Such hatred.
Sad stuff.
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:32 am
by captain static
Don't fret too much Jeff. It's just Springer style therapy for our wonderful dysfunctional family.
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:33 am
by lordjim_2001
So will there be topless cat fights? This is Springer style isn't it?