pigsteak wrote:that such a massive coverup with "lies upon lies upon lies" as you say to take place and no one sqwaks.....impossible. come on truth, use your brain. while conspracies make for fun fires around the campfire, don't sell yourself short with such blather.
next you'll think JFK had multiple shooters....and, do you think Big O is lying that he say footage of OBL with his head ripped off recently? being that OBL has been dead, what ten years now?
Maybe somebody has squawked and you haven't heard about it, or maybe you have, impossible for me to know, or maybe not.
EricDorsey wrote:Most of the questions in that article have common sense answers and I am not even going to take the time to respond to them. If you can't see why those proposed "questions" are full of shit then you will never get it. Check back with me in 20 years and see how far your conspiracy theories have gone. God I can only hope the majority of the american public isn't as dense as you.
This is a taste of how far it's gone... it is going all the way...
LK Day wrote:Truth seems to be incapable of using his brain. I keep trying to tell the dumb son of a bitch that there is no "official denial of molten metal", yet he keeps yammering on about it. Maybe he ought to watch his own fucking video.
No one has answered my statements "true" or "false" yet, but you seem to imply that there's no official denial of the molten metal. Have you watched this?
OK dumbfuck: Let's try this again. The answer is FALSE - There is no "official denial of molten metal" Get that? Gross is denying the presence of MOLTEN STEEL! There was plenty of molten metal at ground zero, most notably tons of molten aircraft aluminum. It can be seen streaming from the point where the 767 crashed into the building. NO OFFICIAL DENIES THE PRESENCE OF THAT MOLTEN METAL. Your dumbassed video shows a red hot steel beam and implies that it is molten. It clearly is not. It also shows molten aluminum pouring from the crash site and implies that that is molten steel. It is not. It also shows a big hunk of concrete and shit and implies that it is evidence of a "pool of molten steel". Simply hilarious. Nobody from your side has ever produced one fucking ounce of the steel in question, or even a photograph of this molten steel. You are obsessed with the notion that officials denied the presence of "molten metal" (they did not) and that, somehow, the presence of "molten metal" in a fire that was undeniably hot enough to melt aircraft aluminum somehow proves your point. What a fucking lunatic.
LK Day wrote:OK dumbfuck: Let's try this again. The answer is FALSE - There is no "official denial of molten metal" Get that? Gross is denying the presence of MOLTEN STEEL! There was plenty of molten metal at ground zero, most notably tons of molten aircraft aluminum. It can be seen streaming from the point where the 767 crashed into the building. NO OFFICIAL DENIES THE PRESENCE OF THAT MOLTEN METAL. Your dumbassed video shows a red hot steel beam and implies that it is molten. It clearly is not. It also shows molten aluminum pouring from the crash site and implies that that is molten steel. It is not. It also shows a big hunk of concrete and shit and implies that it is evidence of a "pool of molten steel". Simply hilarious. Nobody from your side has ever produced one fucking ounce of the steel in question, or even a photograph of this molten steel. You are obsessed with the notion that officials denied the presence of "molten metal" (they did not) and that, somehow, the presence of "molten metal" in a fire that was undeniably hot enough to melt aircraft aluminum somehow proves your point. What a fucking lunatic.
To LK's points... (if this is a repost, sorry- half heartedly following this debate)
Truther what do you have to say to that youtube video? Seems waaaaaay more logical than the bullshit you are posting. You are to stupid to understand the difference between "molten metal" and "molten steel" so I doubt you will ever see the errors with your logic. The truther arguements are just so full of holes and incomplete truths when you look at them. So to answer your questions, there was a denial of molten steel by Gross and there was molten metal found out the WTC sites. So how again does this show it was a controlled demolition? Come on man you can't be this dense can ya?
LK Day wrote:OK dumbfuck: Let's try this again. The answer is FALSE - There is no "official denial of molten metal" Get that? Gross is denying the presence of MOLTEN STEEL! There was plenty of molten metal at ground zero, most notably tons of molten aircraft aluminum. It can be seen streaming from the point where the 767 crashed into the building. NO OFFICIAL DENIES THE PRESENCE OF THAT MOLTEN METAL. Your dumbassed video shows a red hot steel beam and implies that it is molten. It clearly is not. It also shows molten aluminum pouring from the crash site and implies that that is molten steel. It is not. It also shows a big hunk of concrete and shit and implies that it is evidence of a "pool of molten steel". Simply hilarious. Nobody from your side has ever produced one fucking ounce of the steel in question, or even a photograph of this molten steel. You are obsessed with the notion that officials denied the presence of "molten metal" (they did not) and that, somehow, the presence of "molten metal" in a fire that was undeniably hot enough to melt aircraft aluminum somehow proves your point. What a fucking lunatic.
To LK's points... (if this is a repost, sorry- half heartedly following this debate)
Damn, 2core. That's the best debunking of truther lies that I've seen. If I'd known that video existed I wouldn't have subjected myself to the torture of actually watching those fucked up propoganda pieces that Truther linked to. I spent more time than I care to admit watching that shit, being very careful to listen to what was actually said, then looking up the facts - melting points of various metals, best information on the temperatures of the fires, what happens to airplanes when they burn, whether or not it would have even been possible been to produce the so called "demolition" that the truthers carry on about (It's not).
The expose' of the doctored photo that purportedly shows "molten steel" is pure beauty. Thanks. I only care because I think there is a very real risk that the truthers will one day succeed in convincing some unstable individual to pull off a Timothy McVeigh style attack in revenge against the U.S. government. I fear that the Truthers may one day have the blood of thousands of innocents on their hands.
LOL, too funny LK. I watched one video from his links on my iphone, then it came up with a list of "similar" videos and one said Debunking 9/11: Molten metal, so I clicked on that.
Glad it helped.
I think I should get the thread kill for this but I know Truther will never stop...
