Page 67 of 75
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:35 pm
by pigsteak
so wes, you are not denying my allegation , are you....
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:10 pm
by Wes
pigsteak wrote:so wes, you are not denying my allegation , are you....
Ha a little bit of PP (levels, curves, warming filter) in these photos, but no removing of stick clips.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:17 pm
by pigsteak
see, a bit of PP here, a little more there...
sort of like the slippery slope of chipping holds....
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:20 pm
by Wes
pigsteak, Nope, not for me at least. I am a DIGITAL photographer - end-to-end. I even set my camera up with post processing in mind. I do remove stick clips and stuff like that sometimes as well, just not in these shots.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:22 pm
by pigsteak
man, your shoots rock..chip all the footholds you need, edit all stickclips away..heck, can you space the bolts so it actually looks like we aren't wussy sport climbers?
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:38 pm
by Paul3eb
pigsteak wrote:sort of like the slippery slope of chipping holds....
i thought that was the point: to make them less slippery and more climbable..
damnit! why is the most beautiful rock often the most featureless.. and in order to have climbs you have to have some features (crimps or pockets or what have you).. but all i want to do is climb the beautiful rock (you solve the logic on that one
just a few substitutions and transitions)
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:41 pm
by pigsteak
i hear your pain brother....
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 1:45 am
by Wes
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:47 pm
by mcrib
Are those first two the high hard one?
how did zac do on convicted?
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:55 pm
by Wes
mcrib, Yep, first three are of high hard one. And he did pretty well on convicted, no sendage, but looked really solid and close to me.
