FS ROAD 9 CURRENT STATUS
i don't know. since the area is simply DBNF land and not the RRG proper, i would think that you are right in part... that the yahoos will be back and trash the place, but they are currently trashing other places, so within the RRG proper. Spreading out the impact may be better in the long run. Carrying Capacity issues say that we need this area.
[size=75]i may be weak, but i have bad technique[/size]
-
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:05 pm
Indian Creek IS within the RRG, LAC area and is part of the Archaeological District.
"Be responsible for your actions and sensitive to the concerns of other visitors and land managers. ... Your reward is the opportunity to climb in one of the most beautiful areas in this part of the country." John H. Bronaugh
- Ascentionist
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:23 pm
- Ascentionist
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:23 pm
i think there's a provision for it in the LAC paperwork:
"if it is determined that if the establishment of new regulations due to findings in Limits of Acceptable Change process results in total disregard of said regulations by those who recreate on the land, the USFS retains the right to shoot said individuals at will. This act is covered under provision 9mm.357.45 which states in part "if we did all this work and filed out all these damn government forms just for you to ignore them, then prepare for us to be pissed off and react with deadly force".
"if it is determined that if the establishment of new regulations due to findings in Limits of Acceptable Change process results in total disregard of said regulations by those who recreate on the land, the USFS retains the right to shoot said individuals at will. This act is covered under provision 9mm.357.45 which states in part "if we did all this work and filed out all these damn government forms just for you to ignore them, then prepare for us to be pissed off and react with deadly force".
[size=75]i may be weak, but i have bad technique[/size]