Page 5 of 13
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:03 pm
by JR
Mike Anderson. Un-smooth.
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:20 pm
by Andrew
Dang, caught red handed. Maybe he did it on purpose???
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:10 am
by woodchuck008
If you clear the next 30 ft. of trail and spot a pristine line to work, is that kosher or is the entire wall for say next 100 ft. of obvious future lines, still all part of the plans by original developer? Where do you draw the line in the rhotos?
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:55 am
by RRO
just talk to who is in the area. after that then its up to you two how its handled. why make it more difficult than that ?
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:05 am
by pigsteak
RRO wrote:just talk to who is in the area. after that then its up to you two how its handled. why make it more difficult than that ?
+72
naw, plus +372
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:43 pm
by Yasmeen
Very lame, mike_anderson. You've been called out publicly a few times now in this thread - what's your response?
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:12 pm
by rjackson
Yasmeen wrote:Very lame, mike_anderson. You've been called out publicly a few times now in this thread - what's your response?
+1
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:45 pm
by Jeff
+10
interested to hear why you might have thought this was an acceptable thing to do?
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:50 am
by pigsteak
Jeff wrote:+10
interested to hear why you might have thought this was an acceptable thing to do?
because you, sir jeff, do not own the walls. bc climbers are takers all the time anyway. bc it was there. bc he could.bc your work to put in trails don't mean sh**. bc your work on access don't mean sh**. bc your finding top access and hangin your static lines don't mean sh**. bc if we ain't self absorbed with spray and ticklists, it is with the FA's. bc that is the same sort of person who would skip family traditions to go on a sick roadtrip to the Valley or Joe's. bc that is the same person who is thinking about their next burn while belaying you. bc these douche bags ask what you got on so they can spray about their day.
you know, the usual reasons.....but you wouldn't understand jeff, bc you actually are a decent person.
Re: Developing at a wall being developed
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:14 am
by dustonian
sure it's lame. But as a side note & to play devil's advocate here, do you guys really care that much about who ends up rap-bolting another sport route here? I mean, ego aside, in a way he just saved somebody $100 and a half day of tedious manual labor, no? There's enough rock here not to get too bent outta shape and slander a guy over one selfish blunder.