To help those in doubt..

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
the lurkist
Posts: 2240
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 2:07 pm

Post by the lurkist »

Crankmas wrote:obama's masculinity??? are you effing kidding me- that puke throws like a bitch and bows to Burger King
I knew it. That was easy.
The only thing that is going to suck for you worse than Obama'a first four years will be his second four years.
That is the way it was for me with Bush.
"It really is all good ! My thinking only occasionally calls it differently..."
Normie
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

Lurk is right...this sixteen year period will be the worst in our country's history...

however, Obama might be as vulnerable as Bush was getting re-elected. The Dems were just idiots putting up Kerry. And this time Obama is trying to deliver on everything he promised which for 30% of those who voted for him is a very scary end result.....then another 30% only vote Dem anyway, so they are the sheeple...and another 30% just hated Bush and neo cons in general, and O was the default..and the final 30% couldn't name the VP, or even three other Dems who were in the last Presidentail primary, proof positive that Obama won more out of anger and frustration than brilliant ideas....

there ya have it, the reason 120% of the US loves the Prez...
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

I thought he won because people had "hope". Hope of what? :|
User avatar
ynot
Posts: 6432
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:02 am

Post by ynot »

change. the same BS every politician swears to. change is about all that's going to be left of your paycheck.
"Everyone should have a plan for the zombie apocolipse" Courtney
Crankmas
Posts: 3961
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by Crankmas »

remember in the sixties when obama's political directions weren't considered centered in democratic party fundamental issues but were known as the aspirations of the viet Cong
Meadows
Posts: 5395
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:03 pm

Post by Meadows »

:lol:

For once, I understand Crank and it's clever!
the lurkist
Posts: 2240
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 2:07 pm

Post by the lurkist »

Crankmas wrote:remember in the sixties when obama's political directions weren't considered centered in democratic party fundamental issues but were known as the aspirations of the viet Cong
oh, I get it. Cong... As in King Kong, right. Like an ape...
so you are saying Obama is a monkey?
you are a fucking racist.
"It really is all good ! My thinking only occasionally calls it differently..."
Normie
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Post by pigsteak »

Shamis on here is nicknamed Kong too, and he happens to be white....and a liberal....Lurk, are you just displaying more of your looney liberal white man guilt?
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
User avatar
Clevis Hitch
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:10 pm

Post by Clevis Hitch »

Isn't a Kong one of those dog toys that you can put a "treat" into and your dog can chew on trying to get the "treat" out of? They always reminded me of a Triple Ripple BP. Those were the nastiest!!!
If you give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute. If you set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
OZ
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 3:55 pm

Post by OZ »

You mean the political direction that references the Constitution as "just a goddamned piece of paper"?
Post Reply