Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:43 am
by pigsteak
so long catlanta......so long.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:57 pm
by Wes
Number 11 seed isn't bad at all, considering...
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:14 pm
by jordancolburn
nope, Uk actually had the worst record and RPI of the last four in, but still got a higher seed than some other teams.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:20 pm
by herbalist
uk should not be in.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:10 pm
by pigsteak
agreed, and I love UK.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:23 pm
by charlie
Yippee, it's the annual UK Haters conversation! Billy Packer would be proud.
Rumors are just that. Heard them all, before the season even started, from people at work at the courthouse as well as some 14 yr old cheerleader that moonlights at Camelot West. None of you (or us) know anything unless we get the call for bail money.
You guys don't want to talk about your team instead of maybe hating on ours? Maybe mention taking an over hyped TN team to the wire w/o 2 of our best players or the streak we've had the last half of the season?
As far as the tourney goes, would you prefer VA Tech or who exactly? Strength of schedule, late season performance, and fans that will actually buy tickets and show up to the tourney remain factors the selection committee never ignore (for any bubble team). Aside from that, whatever issues you have with us getting in should be allayed by a freakin solid Marquette team in the first round.
Haters.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:17 pm
by Steve
Simmer down kids! We all know the NCAA Tourney is about making money, the basketball comes second. UK is in because UK fans travel well, and more likely the case this year will watch the game...errrrr ads...on TV.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:59 pm
by Crankmas
UK 56 Marquette 51