New Board

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.
User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:48 pm

Post by ray »

How about something like this?
http://www.phpbbhacks.com/viewhack.php?id=220
Gretchen
Posts: 2064
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:16 pm

Post by Gretchen »

THat seems to be a fair solution. Kinda of like a soccer game! Without the riot!!
Just genuinely disengenuous.
TexasK
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 1:20 pm

Post by TexasK »

:arrow:
Last edited by TexasK on Tue Oct 21, 2003 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
" ...... every day I'm more and more dismayed by the sheer numbers of idiots in this country. I dream of running off into what remains of our wild spaces and .......... "
- Sandy
Gretchen
Posts: 2064
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 1:16 pm

Post by Gretchen »

good signature TK!
Just genuinely disengenuous.
Horatio Felacio
Posts: 3338
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 7:26 pm

Post by Horatio Felacio »

man, if you're really serious about kicking people off for not obeying the rules, you'd better change em. not one damn person obeys all of that garbage.
Yo HO!! Just got me a code red and some funyons big dawg!!! SHIT YEAH! - Ray, excited about his breakfast
User avatar
ray
Site Admin
Posts: 841
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:48 pm

Post by ray »

I've never read those rules. I'll change em' if they're gay.
I don't think people would vote to kick someone off just for disobeying the "rules".

I just can't think of a better way to handle the situation than letting the majority of the users decide. That way no single person feels responsible either.
TexasK
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 1:20 pm

Post by TexasK »

:arrow:
Last edited by TexasK on Tue Oct 21, 2003 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve
Posts: 1745
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:34 am

Post by Steve »

The problem with kicking people off is that they can come right back. That and taking a vote doesn't help because how long ya gonna leave the polls open? If everyone doesn't have a chance to vote than the site ain't very dem-o-cratic.
I see they are still lopping off mountains in Eastern Kentucky. Electricity isn't cheap.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Actually you can ban IP addresses. If they are dynamic, you can use wildcards (at the risk of banning others, too, though). I believe email domains can also be banned - so for instance all hotmail.com and other free accts - if it comes to that.

Speaking of which, Ray, you may want to enable email authentication and require unique email addresses. That makes it harder for people to troll. If the free accts become a problem later, ban those domains. This will require that new users use their real addresses, which they can then choose to keep private.

I think everyone is anticipating a whole lotta trouble but basing these concerns on the last days of ClimbKentucky.com. I don't think it'll ever get that bad. First of all, there are moderators on this site. Also, ever since Climb Kentucky has been down, most people realize what a valuable resource it was and won't want to risk tearing this site apart in the same way. I think this is all very premature and the rules should evolve as they become necessary. Instead of focusing on the negatives, let's give Ray some useful suggestions on what to do with this site!
Steve
Posts: 1745
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 1:34 am

Post by Steve »

Ahh so you can ban IPs and e-mail addys. Fair enough, I'm technologically inept.

Interesting thought. People didn't realize what a valuable thing climbky was until it was gone. The final days of climbky...sounds so apocalyptic. This is all very strange to me, I feel like I'm in some sort of post-American like country, that or sitting around watching the Constitution be drawn up.

I'm a soured cynic but when its all said and done I somehow doubt things will change, as much as I might want them to.
I see they are still lopping off mountains in Eastern Kentucky. Electricity isn't cheap.
Post Reply