Page 4 of 6

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:44 pm
by Howie Feltersnatch
I like Ron Paul about 80% of the time. His laissez faire attitude towards protecting our natural resources, coupled with his son's desire to see east KY turned back into the coal-controlled haven that was pre-60's (not that it still isn't to some degree) turns me off quickly, to what would otherwise be a platform that I would really get behind. They have this idea that we can let the legal system handle any environmental damage that takes place from corporations, when Kentucky politics have proven time and again that such is not the case.

Also now that we are on the topic of health care reform, how do those in the health care industry feel about new companies such as Club MD who are insurance providers who also provide primary care and preventative care and treatment?

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:47 pm
by Crankmas
let companies across state lines compete of course, deal with existing conditions of course, when illegal aliens get a free ride and unfortunate citizens are financially destroyed the system needs fixing, obamacare fixes nothing and makes matters considerably worse, 2800 pages that no one whom signed it read, what a fucking pathetic joke! obama is nothing more than a liar and a fraud

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 11:22 pm
by toad857
fraudulent? that's more of a GOP thing, wouldn't you say?

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:32 am
by pigsteak
toad857 wrote:fraudulent? that's more of a GOP thing, wouldn't you say?
as soon as the Edwards trial gets done I'll get back to you on that one.

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:09 am
by michaelarmand
pigsteak wrote:
toad857 wrote:fraudulent? that's more of a GOP thing, wouldn't you say?
as soon as the Edwards trial gets done I'll get back to you on that one.
Ha! :twisted:

Scary to think how many people voted for this clown in 04.....

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:08 pm
by krampus
pigsteak wrote:
toad857 wrote:fraudulent? that's more of a GOP thing, wouldn't you say?
as soon as the Edwards trial gets done I'll get back to you on that one.
A sex scandal in polotics? OMFG

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:10 pm
by krampus
The only sex scandals that make me bat an eye any more are the ones where Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh talk about preserving the sanctity of marriage.

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 1:29 pm
by bcombs
I like Rush's props. The little marriage dolls grouped in various arrangements. I was hoping he would take one of the grooms and four of the brides and talk about himself for awhile.

Only the dumbest of middle america can possibly get fired up by his buffoonery.

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:46 pm
by pigsteak
wait now I am confused by the frothy mouthed libs coming out of the woodwork...you bash Rush for his various levels of hypocrisy but turn right around and stay silent on Edwards...typical liberal BS....

"dumb middle america".....not racist, not sexist, but some sort of -ism in there.

Re: Election 2012

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:53 pm
by bcombs
What hypocrisy? I'm seriously asking. I don't see John Edwards hosting a show, getting all bent out of shape about supposed attacks on something he holds sacred, while at the same time pissing all over it.

I'm not going to pretend that his target audience doesn't fit in an ism. We all do in some way, shape or form.