Karma Ratings

Having problems with the board or the online guidebook?
Suggestions welcome.
User avatar
rjackson
Posts: 928
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 3:26 pm

Re: Karma Ratings

Post by rjackson »

SCIN wrote:I'm not real motivated to put a lot of time into customizing the non-guidebook portion of this site. I think it serves its purpose as a place to find partners and talk about routes and stuff but Facebook has taken a lot of traffic. The online guidebook is getting a shit ton of activity though and will continue to get updates and enhancements. So keep spraying.
I think I know what's motivating you! It's a whole new world... And I totally agree that this site serves its purpose, and quite well at that. Thanks man.

And you'd be second in the good karma battle, right behind Jeff.
Pick myself up, stop lookin' back.
Grand Funk Railroad
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Re: Karma Ratings

Post by pigsteak »

dustonian wrote:
SCIN wrote:I'm not real motivated to put a lot of time into customizing the non-guidebook portion of this site. I think it serves its purpose as a place to find partners and talk about routes and stuff but Facebook has taken a lot of traffic. The online guidebook is getting a shit ton of activity though and will continue to get updates and enhancements. So keep spraying.
That's just pigsteak & Andrew compulsively checking the "Spray" rankings list 40 times a day.

lol...sadly, dustin, since I started developing "other" crags, I think I have added less than 8-10 climbs to my online resume. but if these other crags go virtual someday, I swear I'll have 40 routes to add immediately....lol
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
User avatar
pigsteak
Posts: 9684
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:49 pm

Re: Karma Ratings

Post by pigsteak »

SCIN wrote:I'm not real motivated to put a lot of time into customizing the non-guidebook portion of this site. I think it serves its purpose as a place to find partners and talk about routes and stuff but Facebook has taken a lot of traffic. The online guidebook is getting a shit ton of activity though and will continue to get updates and enhancements. So keep spraying.
Look at it this way..most of the bitching has gone away....most of it....
Positive vibes brah...positive vibes.
dustonian
Posts: 3089
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:46 pm

Re: Karma Ratings

Post by dustonian »

pigsteak wrote: lol...sadly, dustin, since I started developing "other" crags, I think I have added less than 8-10 climbs to my online resume. but if these other crags go virtual someday, I swear I'll have 40 routes to add immediately....lol
Yeah I know what ya mean...I'm up to 35 "unpublishable" routes now myself...
User avatar
climb2core
Posts: 2224
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Karma Ratings

Post by climb2core »

pigsteak wrote:
dustonian wrote:
SCIN wrote:I'm not real motivated to put a lot of time into customizing the non-guidebook portion of this site. I think it serves its purpose as a place to find partners and talk about routes and stuff but Facebook has taken a lot of traffic. The online guidebook is getting a shit ton of activity though and will continue to get updates and enhancements. So keep spraying.
That's just pigsteak & Andrew compulsively checking the "Spray" rankings list 40 times a day.

lol...sadly, dustin, since I started developing "other" crags, I think I have added less than 8-10 climbs to my online resume. but if these other crags go virtual someday, I swear I'll have 40 routes to add immediately....lol

Somebody has to get the FA on those stellar 5.9s...
User avatar
caribe
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:37 am

Re: Karma Ratings

Post by caribe »

climb2core wrote:
pigsteak wrote:lol...sadly, dustin, since I started developing "other" crags, I think I have added less than 8-10 climbs to my online resume. but if these other crags go virtual someday, I swear I'll have 40 routes to add immediately....lol
Somebody has to get the FA on those stellar 5.9s...
. . . "you will break." (Teddy Bear to the main robot protagonist in the movie AI, 2001, Spielberg)
Post Reply