TradMike wrote:I think some testing is in order. video camera, stopper knot to make sure the climber doesn't deck, various diameters of ropes, gloves and a willing stunt person.
Lets see if we can fail the gri gri by holding the rope above the gri gri with no break hand. I'd imagine the fat ropes would be hard to fail. I'm not sure with the skinny ropes because I only climb on fat ropes and have a good idea how they react. I have seen someone freak out and try to grab the wrong end. It still caught fine but it was an 11mm rope. The skinny ropes do scare me because I have seen how fast they can fly trough the gri gri. And I hate to rappel down from big climbs on twin 8mm ropes because of how hard it is to keep them under control with an atc (they require a backup system for sure). A fat rope will stop you with the weight of the rope alone plus they have tons of friction to engage the cam on a gri gri.
No need... as I stated in my previous post, I've already done this testing. I have video footage of the tests, it used to be posted on the internet, but I don't think the website is still running where the videos were posted. I think I still have them on my personal computer though.
We did exactly what you are explaining... we held the rope above the device (both a gri gri and a cinch) with no break hand and we were able to fail both devices in this manner. Again, it's much easier to do when you're wearing a glove because without a glove the pain of the rope burn will make you eventually let go. We tested on ropes up to 10.3mm and we were able to fail the device with this rope diameter, can't say for sure on any ropes fatter than this, but I'm sure you can still get it to fail... maybe not as much... We tested many other scenarios as well, but I don't feel the need to go in depth on this forum. If you want more details, catch me in person sometime and I'll explain to whole shebang.
Also, on another note, tying a "stopper knot to make sure the climber doesn't deck" isn't always a best practice. It is a good practice if you are using your "locking-assist" device similar to an ATC, because the stopper knot hits your hand and then you know you are close to the end of your rope or whatever. But, it isn't necessarily a best practice if you don't have your break-hand on the rope. The reason is that it is
possible for the knot to roll-over itself and tighten up and get sucked into the device and explode the device. We were only able to make this happen a few times out of all of our drop-tests, but after seeing it happen even just once, I'll never tie a knot on the break-end of my rope if I'm using a "locking-assist" device and I know I won't have my break-hand on the rope. Once the device explodes, you might as well as take it off, it's worth-less. I back-up my device with a prusik instead of with a stopper knot, for example, in a bolting situation, or any other situation where I know I'll be taking my break-hand off the rope.