Page 4 of 8
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:02 pm
by 512OW
Ascentionist... you're absolutely correct, if you're speaking from the point of view of a 5.9 climber. Everything below 5.10 in the Red is basically a chosspile. Colorado is a much better gumby training arena.
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:09 pm
by Steve
One person's dream town is another's hell hole.
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:11 pm
by gregkerzhner
Colorado sucks. Black canyon: choss. Rifle: polished ass grease. Flatirons: Too easy Eldo: Only decent area but ethic ruins it. A rule against placing new bolts is retarded, but a rule against replacing bolts that are already there is almost George Bush retarded. Boulder: Overpriced awful place to live. Denver: Too many minorities.
Never mind, colorado is sweet. Andrew and all his friends should move their immediatly
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:21 pm
by rhunt
Ok so the red river gorge and the new river gorge are the two best sport climbing areas in the country..yes? Both with very limited good climbing seasons because of shitty weather right? Well the weather aside - Columbus, Ohio is exactly 4 hours away from both those climbing areas and so Cbus is the best place to live in the US if you are truly a "sport" climber.
nuff said...
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:25 pm
by Ascentionist
Climbers make climbing suck, therefore "climbing towns" suck.
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:51 pm
by the lurkist
gregkerzhner wrote: Denver: Too many minorities.
Yeah, too many ruskies. Melting pot, shmelting pot....
Why can't they all be dark skinned and beautiful like me....
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:12 pm
by toad857
gregkerzhner wrote:I believe that the towns were rated for proximity to climbing, i.e flagstaff made it even though there is no climbing right in town.
The towns actually have to be towns too, not just a subway and a shell...
priest draw is 5 minutes from flagstaff, and there are lots of other bouldering spots close by. i think flag is a spectacular climbing town
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:05 am
by ahab
Brentucky wrote:i resist to relev in the revelance of this thread.
brentucky, please do not post irrevelant comments to this thread. thank you.
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:38 pm
by Shamis
Lexington's complete lack of any real bouldering kind of kills any chance of being a climbing town.
Chattanooga does seem like a pretty great climbing destination even though I've only hit a couple of the spots around there. There is just so much rock in nearly every direction...
I think west virginia probably has the most untapped rock in the east though. Have you ever noticed that when driving to seneca you'll see dozeons of little seneca's in the distance that nobody except maybe the locals know anything about?
I may very well have left the best climbing town though. Las Vegas. The proximity to great climbing in every direction really makes it stand out in my mind. You've got great sport routes 20 minutes away, good bouldering 20 minutes away, awesome trad routes 20 minutes away. Nice limestone 40 minutes away, and within a 5-7 hour radius you've got most of the best climbing destinations in the country (barring colorado and a few others).
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:08 pm
by rhunt
I have agree with Shamis on that one. Vegas is the best climbing town in the US. If you are an average 5.10 - 5.12 climber you'll have a lifetime of year round climb living in Vegas. Dude what where you thinking moving to Lexington.