Page 4 of 5
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:05 pm
by bcombs
caribe wrote:LDay: Any policy/action that increases suffering and devalues life is something I can't support. I realize that your tongue is in your check though. The population issues needs to be a long term plan.
You get paid to use your tongue? Are they hiring?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:39 pm
by pigsteak
caribe wrote:LDay: Any policy/action that increases suffering and devalues life is something I can't support. I realize that your tongue is in your check though. The population issues needs to be a long term plan.
does the liberal policy on abortion fit this belief? how about the neo con view on capital punishment? are you being consistent either way?
hypocrites, ye all.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:36 pm
by caribe
I support the woman's right to choose. I don't think a 1/3 year-old has any concept of suffering. Natural spontaneous abortion happens all the time and when it does we don't have funerals.
I am not in favor of capital punishment. For one thing it is not reversible and our judicial system is flawed.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:39 pm
by caribe
Pigly Wiggly:
About your caviler attitude about what you eat, you should watch this. We can discuss it in greater detail on the way to the crag.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3411/02.html
eat your soybeans, and keep the pounds off. You are probably healthy as horse despite your diet due to your level of exercise.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:23 pm
by caribe
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:24 pm
by pigsteak
was this before or after you invited me to waffle house for some grease and straight simple sugars? you trying to expedite my demise?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:27 pm
by pigsteak
caribe wrote:I support the woman's right to choose. I don't think a 1/3 year-old has any concept of suffering. Natural spontaneous abortion happens all the time and when it does we don't have funerals.
I am not in favor of capital punishment. For one thing it is not reversible and our judicial system is flawed.
I just never got my head around this argument...save a prisoner, 95% chance of which he is guilty of a heinous crime, or kill an unborn child for convenience or to save on embarassment.....sorry, never got it. for all you anti death penalty folks, are you out there protesting all the unsolved murders which haunt us every year? something like less than 25% of murders are solved..shouldn't you also be ranting on about that loss of innocent life? hypocrites.
btw, I am pro choice and for the death penalty...seems to me the only rational thought process that all life is expendable, based on whatever we feel like today.
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:13 pm
by caribe
95% is not good enough for me and it is not 95%.
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:17 pm
by pigsteak
sorry...closer to 98% are guilty?
I'm done here..this is definitetly a dumb argument to have on the retardweb. I'd rather make fun of you in person, stick clipping up those 5.8s....or was that me?
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:08 pm
by Andrew
Just steal his new draws again.
