ElectricDisciple wrote:You know, the great preacher Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1800s) believed that all the dust particles that could be seen in the sunlight of the window moved only by God's power, through his control, and as He wished. I'll throw this proverbial bee in your bonnet. God controls all the molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles in the same way. The very act of you breathing right now is because of God's divine sovereignty and by his good pleasure. If He were to withdraw His power, you would collapse and die of suffocation.
How's that ?
But, dude, like, uh you know, like, what if we don't, like, exist. Ya know - like what if we're just some other dude's dream, but, like, cuz we're in the dream, we don't know that it's a dream. Ya know?!?!
If by 'great preacher' you mean someone who can come up with ideological constructs that prop up a belief system, then, yes, this bit of pointlessly circular reasoning is brilliant.
Can you document instances where God has changed the rules of physics? Is it repeatable?
No, I didn't think so. So you are looking at a consistent world through empirical observation. (Dust particles exist, they float in air currents, sunlight interacts with them in a particular way, etc.) You are creating an untestable mental construct (God makes this happen) that you overlay on what you observe. Whoopdee do. Where's the 'bee in the bonnet'?
Listen, a major construct of the worship of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is that the decline in the numbers of pirates around the world correlates with global warming. There are fewer and fewer pirates and the average global atmospheric is increasing at the same time. Clearly, the decline in pirates is causing global warming. How's that for a bee in your bonnet.
Obviously, there is no causal connection. But as we've been discussing, there is no way to disprove the idea that the decline in pirates causes global warming. There is no way to disprove that we are all part of some dream. In the same way there is no way to disprove the idea that God is actively suspending the motes of dust in the air.
So, you present this shallow, but poetic idea. So what?