RRC Archives

krampus wrote:the libs will never be able to change the second amendment. Hopefully, the neo-cons won't change the first

i don't think they will change the actual amendment, but slowly restricting it won't cause us to fight it as much. mark my words...the assault ban will be reenacted 2nd term if big O wins. watch for ammo caches to dry up and prices to skyrocket. there's more than one way to change the 2nd amendment. the recent supreme court ruling was too close for comfort. look at california.

Good thing I got an AR-15 on my Christmas wish list. Better get it soon.

see, paranoia reigns.....

what are you people shooting with all this ammo and guns? dead dishwashers? or are you going to take on the national guard?

Anything that needs shootin'.

guns are a lazy man's baseball bat.

LK Day wrote:Anything that needs shootin'.

absolutely.

is it still paranoia if it's true? brady campaign? eric holder? anyone? anyone?

the first step in every genocide of the last 100 years has been to disarm the people. turks and armenians, stalin and ukraine, pol pot and kampuchea, hitler and the jews, the list goes on.

also, if anyone knows the least bit about guns and looks at the restrictions imposed by 922r or the assault weapons ban, they will realize that the restrictions do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO MAKE GUNS LESS DANGEROUS. all they do is RESTRICT GUNS.

"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." -Mao Zedong

possum2082 wrote:is it still paranoia if it's true? brady campaign? eric holder? anyone? anyone?

the first step in every genocide of the last 100 years has been to disarm the people. turks and armenians, stalin and ukraine, pol pot and kampuchea, hitler and the jews, the list goes on.

No, that doesn't sound the least bit paranoid.

again, how is it paranoia if administrations and their constituents have said it is their goal to eventually disarm the american people?

i don't think human nature has changed and i like to learn from the past. also, i feel very passionately about this b/c i don't believe that the rest of our bill of rights would be worth the hemp it's printed on if the people did not possess some strength in arms.

ra·tion·al·ize
to ascribe (one's acts, opinions, etc.) to causes that superficially seem reasonable and valid but that actually are unrelated to the true, possibly unconscious and often less creditable or agreeable causes.

Just admit you like your guns and assault rifles and whatever and want to keep them, don't dress it up with the corny, self-righteous interest group propaganda. The country would be far better off without you caped crusaders prancing about and waving your surrogate phalluses around.