RRC Archives

Posted: **Mon May 03, 2004 9:33 pm**

so, if it goes on (good) gear, then why should it have bolts? is there ample good gear? I think Sandy may be FOS, though.

Posted: **Mon May 03, 2004 9:45 pm**

Sandy got some crack!? what the hell, were you holding out on us? eh, fuck the bolts and gear, its easy, just solo it.

Posted: **Mon May 03, 2004 11:29 pm**

hamsco wrote:Sandy well you are a BITCH!!!!!
I know you chopped my bolts...and I better see the hangers at Miguel's when I get there!!! And money for new bolts!!!

Just cause you think it's a pile doesen't make you the bolt police!!!

Posted: **Mon May 03, 2004 11:30 pm**

Eagleman wrote:Sandy got some crack!? what the hell, were you holding out on us? eh, fuck the bolts and gear, its easy, just solo it.

nah, I'm not into crack cocaine (or butt crack), just cracks in rock. I shared my only poison with you, I swear!

Posted: **Tue May 04, 2004 2:38 am**

PS - so Hamsco, why did you bolt Eureka anyway, when you have led it on gear yourself? Hmmmmmm?

You know those bolt hangers make a pretty fine bling-bling, if I do say so myself. Wanna go clubbing? 8)

Posted: **Tue May 04, 2004 2:40 am**

tee hee you said "bling bling"

Posted: **Tue May 04, 2004 2:41 am**

<mental picture> Hamsco clubbing!</mental picture>

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA

Posted: **Tue May 04, 2004 6:34 am**

Sandy wrote:PS - so Hamsco, why did you bolt Eureka anyway, when you have led it on gear yourself? Hmmmmmm?

Sandy, according to Hamsco's spray list he climbs 5.11 trad. It doesn't take much for a 5.11 trad climber to climb a 5.6 face climb on gear. Now, if you take a 5.6 trad climber and put him on Eureka you may see the problem. Besides, that thing wouldn't even look like a line if it didn't have bling bling on it.

Posted: **Tue May 04, 2004 12:21 pm**

pfffft! I think we should tar and feather him.

Posted: **Tue May 04, 2004 1:29 pm**

andy_lemon wrote:grandure

try:grandeur

RRC Archives

Eureka chopped again!