Military Stands Down

Post by **Crankmas** » Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:26 pm

agreed an easy fix- the military needs to know it is being lead by a commander in chief who is legally capable of being the president- screw the populace they're a bunch of a-holes but the military deserves better

Post by **rhunt** » Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:49 pm

pigsteak - and all i am saying is that we all need something to cry about...just make it worth it.

Post by **pigsteak** » Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:56 pm

I am just glad the political threads are back!

now I need some neo cons to bring up Palin for Prez so I can argue against her.....

why don't all you bleeding, whiny libs argue for conservative stances for awhile, and I'll argue your side? it'd be much more fun that way....

Post by **Crankmas** » Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:01 pm

Rock Hudson for President - oh, I guess that won't work so well after all

Post by **rustyvasectomy** » Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:08 pm

Crankmas wrote:the subject is birth certificate an/or means to prove legitimate grounds that oboyma meets the minimum requirements to hold the office of the presidency, there were a few requirements that the founding fathers wrote into the constitution (are you with me so far??) that one has to meet, oboyma has not been able to meet any of these requirements, a military officer set for overseas deployment , who among the others pledging to uphold the constitution , has seen fit to challenge oboyma's lack of demonstrated right to hold office, the military officer cites correctly that any order he/she follows must be legit, if oboyma is indeed ineligible to be president then US military personnel serving overseas could be view as enemy combatants and not protected under the Geneva Convention- look backward all you want to but the rest of us might not be waiting on you

not one period. not even one

Post by **sendit** » Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:58 am

Would this ever have been brought up if he wasn't black?

Post by **pigsteak** » Thu Jul 16, 2009 1:55 am

sendit wrote:Would this ever have been brought up if he wasn't black?

um, with a white mother, isn't he just as white as he is black? and if so, can't we just insert "white" for "black" in your silly question.....

Post by **sendit** » Thu Jul 16, 2009 2:26 am

pigsteak wrote:
sendit wrote:Would this ever have been brought up if he wasn't black?
um, with a white mother, isn't he just as white as he is black? and if so, can't we just insert "white" for "black" in your silly question.....

thank you piggy for pointing that out, I almost forgot....

you're right, he should really be "Barack Hussein Obama" 44th white president of the US of A. Say what?!

Back in the real world, Obama is married to a black woman. He goes to a black church. He's worked with poor people on the South Side of Chicago, where he lived till recently.
In this world we live in white + black=black.

But what you must be advocating is that Obama is a "post racial president" who has transcended the labels of race to appeal to all races. I'm on to you piggy

Post by **_Rasputin** » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:53 am

rasputin..aren't you bringing up old news?

those photos are of a
certificate of live birth, not a birth certificate. please check the difference

Pigsteak, if you had read the link I attached you would have read that FactCheck.org did examine the ORIGINAL certificate, not the photo, and found it to be authentic, so yes he is a U.S. citizen.

Post by **_Rasputin** » Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:55 am

Raspy-did you bother to read that post..., then reread, itmakes no conclusions but does state a few things that could have happened- way strong- not!!

Sorry, but with all you rambling you sound a lot like Rush Limbaugh and I've learned to tune out the B.S.