Page 3 of 7

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 6:23 pm
by young'n climber
The Legend=mank central

Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 11:29 pm
by JB
ahh, but i climbed in lander all winter, and had sweet powder when it was too cold to climb.

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:55 am
by pigsteak
real climbers never find it too cold jb. :wink:

sounds like you are living your dream....enjoy it, and write the story.

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 12:19 pm
by Wes
May 17: Rained pretty good most of yesterday afternoon and night. Temp is 50 this morning, with a bit of overcast sky. Walls look ok this morning, but with the cold temps, there is a chance of condensation.

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 1:10 pm
by kato
Who the heck needs a "nowcast"? I just look out the window for the "nowcast".

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:54 pm
by ynot
What now cast? we are calling it Wes cast.

Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:57 pm
by Wes
kato wrote:Who the heck needs a "nowcast"? I just look out the window for the "nowcast".
True, but if you know the conditions at a crag (torrent), then you have a baseline for the other crags, and that might help decide where you want to go, rather then if you are coming down at all...

Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 12:38 am
by Barnacle Ben
I have actually been finding the nowcast quite helpful, my smartass comment about Climb time conditions notwithstanding. Thanks Wes.

Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 12:47 am
by neuroshock
I too have found the nowcast very helpful. When deciding whether to drive 7+ hours each way for 1.5 days of climbing, it's nice to know how that forecasted "60% chance of showers for Tues-Fri" actually turned out. Ya know, poured for the last 3 days straight versus a 2 hour sprinkle on just Wednesday.

Thanks Wes!

Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 1:14 am
by pkananen
It would be interesting to keep a record of what the forecast said the night before compared to what happened during the day over a long period, to see how accurate the forecast generally is.