Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 3:37 pm
by kirker
They're called consequences, and they didn't get the good kind. They had to know there would be risks with the decision. To bad they proably smoked one while weighing theirs. Hell we've all made a bad decison at one time or another. Just have to one day quit fucking crying about it and move on.
Nobody wear Patagonia away. Except those sponsered by them, and the jerry's who's mom and dad pay for it. No else can afford it.
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 3:43 pm
by gregkerzhner
Myke Dronez wrote:There was nothing about the climb all that impressive for Potter- 60 feet with an 11+ crux. So to act like it wasn't a publicity stunt is pretty stupid, Delicate Arch is on the Utah license plate for fucks sake. He should stick to solos that climbers can respect or start hanging out with the French Spiderman.
talkin out of your ass
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 6:05 pm
by Gregory
Always remember, no cameras, no pictures, and never ever write anything down. When will you people learn?
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 6:44 pm
by Myke Dronez
Maybe so, but why stir up trouble when you're physically able to perform greater feats? I think theres plenty of respect to go around for Potter and Robert without Delicate Arch or Spiderman suits.
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:28 pm
by charlie
I've got a pair of Patagonia river shorts. I like them.
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:06 pm
by rhunt
Well maybe the damn thing will fall down soon, then we can blame Dean for that!
Oh and didn't the brilliant park service screw the names up - delicate arch is suppose to be called landscape arch??
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:54 pm
by TradMike
The grooves he wore into the arch from his rap rope will probably bring it down a day or so sooner. I think that is what the park was pissed about.
Interesting site
http://www.byteland.org/naturalist/delicatearch.html