RRC Archives

I did not seew W. Was it good?

The film chronicled his personal, religious, educational and political life. Again, much of the inner pictures of Bush's life were difficult to believe--especially aspects of his religious life and the bible-based mandate that he felt he had.

This is nothing to do with Bush, this has something to do with some Christians, but I also find this odd.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010 ... ?th&emc=th

i thought W. was easy on...W.
especially for a stone flick. it kinda made him out to be a bumbling idiot, which is true enough i'm sure, but i feel the reality is probably much more sinister.

day, you must be joking. he (they) called it "the war on terror" to make it vague and open ended. just like the wars they waged.

ahab, how is Obama doing closing out these needless wars?

he's doing horrid.
i didn't vote for him, but did catch the "hope" bug briefly after he was elected.
that bug was promptly squashed.

also, i like how you immediately inferred that i was a libby obammerite after i knocked the Dubya.
both parties are equally despicable, i assure you.

"vague and open ended" works for me. I'm all for tracking down and killing the last motherfucking Jihadi on earth, wherever they are, and however long it takes. But, really, Bush was just being PC, what with Islam being the "religion of peace"* and all.


*W

lol...now you assume that I was assuming. I actually asked you since you seemed to have a pulse on politics...btw, I did vote for Obama...not apologizing just yet.....we gave Bush 8 years to screw it up, so at least another few years is fair.

L K Day wrote: .....what with Islam being the "religion of peace"* and all.