"Closed Project" crack???

Post by **512OW** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:13 am

I think you've already had too much crack.

TURN OFF THE ALL CAPS!!!!!

Post by **ynp1** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 4:49 pm

TRAD-SEEKER, keep the name, chop the bolt.

Post by **Horatio Felacio** » Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:25 pm

change the name to "mr. t's mysterious rectal warts".

Post by **One-Fall** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 12:49 am

ynp1 wrote:TRAD-SEEKER, keep the name, chop the bolt.

Does this mean sport routes that have been soloed should be chopped?

Post by **haas** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:04 am

One-Fall wrote: Does this mean sport routes that have been soloed should be chopped?

Absolutely

Post by **ynot** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:06 am

Nah .Ya'll are aproaching the problem the wrong way. Why not just chop the sport climbers. Problem solved.

Post by **meetVA** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:27 am

really, why use any protective gear at all? including thought.

Post by **Spragwa** » Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:06 am

Always wear a raincoat...that's what mama said.

Post by **ynp1** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 9:12 pm

One-Fall, he did the FA with out the bolt. he can do whatever he wants...

Post by **One-Fall** » Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:13 am

LOL, I'll bite.

ynp1. . . maybe its not a popular way of thinking, but I disagree. The bolt was placed there for safety reasons.

I personally don't think anything should be stripped without talking to the RRGCC who own the land and set the safety standards AND contacting Rockman. What purpose does removing the bolt have?