Re: Nice Outside Online arcticle on Muir Valley
Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:55 pm
The old Redriverclimbing.com Forums
https://rrcarchives.com/forums/
I think more accurate numbers would be 5,000 who climb 4 or so weekends a year (20,000) and then 10,000 who might be one time visitors as a part of a big group. This is rough speculation on estimated numbers, but most of the climbers I know personally climb at Muir a couple of times a year in addition to visiting other areas. These people (the 5000 or so) will be more likely to care about the long term impact and be convinced to donate on a recurring basis at a higher level (I know this thread has made me more aware of the disparity between what I pay for climbing gear and travel and what I donate to the places I climb). The masses who show up only periodically need to be educated (signs, this website, climbing media as a whole) to contribute a few bucks to the places they climb.clif wrote: jordancolburn, what i would hope to draw attention to is the possibility that of the 30,000 visitations their are probably 300-500 people who are visiting 100 times a year and then hordes of generally bigger and less experienced groups who also being less passionate about the sport and maybe even the outdoors are much less inclined toward the impulses of preservation and access. i think the Weber's effort to engage this group is awesome. i'm just encouraging a slightly less simplistic approach to the issue. i could be wrong.
Agreed, but it might be harder than it sounds. In Illinois, the law recently changed to not allow free recreational use for climbing without liability. It didn't specifically mention climbing, but omitting it from permitted recreational activities left the land owners out in the cold and got the place I learned to climb, Draper's Bluff Closed.Josephine wrote:One option that has not been considered: lobby to change the law. In the Gunks they have many of the same amenities as Muir (parking lots, toilets, roads, emergency personel) and they are able to charge access. Perhaps Roadside would reopen. We could quit trying to fundraise to fix the roads in the Pmrp and use the money to put in nice roads etc. everyone wins.
Right on, Jeff!!Jeff wrote:Rick and Liz, as always, thanks for your passion, continued generosity, and the unimaginable ability to let all the negativity roll off you. I'm sure you know the (silent) majority are thankful.
+1Jeff wrote:Rick and Liz, as always, thanks for your passion, continued generosity, and the unimaginable ability to let all the negativity roll off you. I'm sure you know the (silent) majority are thankful.
Thank you for this comment, C2C. I wholeheartedly agree with this and believe the comparisons should STOP. These are two distinct areas that operate differently, but both offer extraordinary climbing.climb2core wrote:Patrick, while I can understand the desire to compare MV to the PMRP. However, I would say that the comparison is mostly not relevant and will not yield anything of value.