Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:38 am
by pawilkes
maybe she just doesn't put out and knows that Bill needs an outlet. Interestingly, other world leaders are well known to have affairs and their people don't give a shit. maybe we're just a bit uptight about all this.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:39 am
by pawilkes
maybe she just doesn't put out and knows that Bill needs an outlet. Interestingly, other world leaders are well known to have affairs and their people don't give a shit. maybe we're just a bit uptight about all this.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:20 am
by tomdarch
That situation does seem a bit sketchy to me, but is it any of our business?

But in comparison to the Senator and Mrs. Craig situation, Hillary looks pretty good. And in comparison to the really messed up home life of Giuliani...

What is the deal with so many Republicans whining about how gay marriage is a threat to marriage when divorce is so rampant (particularly among Republican politicians)? It's all the more amazing that the Clintons have stayed together.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:34 am
by Crankmas
I think Hillary is gonna get the Dem nomination and I'm gonna vote for her as president

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:39 am
by rhunt
hey Crank..me too only today I'd rather it be Obama...but Hillary will be OK.

hey Tom, you must not have gotten your fundy right wing memo that clearly reminds us to believe in the sanctity(notice that word has tity in it) of marriage. I framed my memo and hung it above my bed next to the banner that say."God fates Fags" but I have another copy I can email to you.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:47 am
by Meadows
pigsteak wrote: that being said, having someone as stoic and composed as her may be a real asset in the position.
And maintaining such composure through such a very public and humiliating ordeal takes MORE strength than any of us can imagine.

Kudos to her for separating her marriage from her business.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:51 am
by pigsteak
meadows...we agree....

Re: Clinton?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:00 am
by charlie
john e aragon wrote:How could anyone be considering this spineless chick as a possible national leader.
My issues with her as a president have nothing to do with her personal life. She's not running for Good Housekeeping Editor so it's not relevant.

Pedantic issues like these are why we have a religiously crusading, capitalist warmonger in office right now.

Keep your eye on the ball or leave the voting to people who can.

Re: Clinton?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:11 am
by rhunt
charlie wrote:Pedantic issues like these are why we have a religiously crusading, capitalist warmonger in office right now.

Keep your eye on the ball or leave the voting to people who can.
Thanks Charlie for that Friday morning reality check.

What I think is so funny is that Bush is probably faithless and things of god and religion mean nothing to him. He just played that card and won 8 years as the most powerful man in the world. I give him props for that.

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:21 am
by charlie
I know I need to be more patient but this last administration really bothers me in ways I never try not to let politics bother me. So fired up that my post should read "pedestrian" issues instead of "pedantic."