interesting and quick note:tomdarch wrote:Mon Capitan,
Regarding the LAC process, I'd like to ask a blunt question and 'cut to the quick'. How does the current state of the LAC process lead to (or not to) new routes being approved/cleaned/bolted on FS land?
at the recent kentucky gis conference, a few of the supervisors from dbnf gave a presentation about using gis to manage recreate in the rrg, specifically in the clifty wilderness areas. the three guys giving the presentation all were involved with the dbnf and the lac. one even did his master's thesis on the impact of climbing in the rrg.. i'll find out if he's ok with me posting a link to his thesis..
they also discussed how it's being used to help the lac process along. honestly, i didn't know much of anything about the process except that it was just that: a process working to establish a common ground for many user groups.
afterwards, i realized how wide the spectrum of possibilities are on this: groups that want complete conservation to groups that want almost complete use. it's the ability to get a consensus, or at least majority, going with one alternative or another. that is going to directly influence how we as climbers get to use the land.
still, i'm mostly in the dark about it. do what you can to get educated, contact the dbnf, contact the rrgcc, contact static. be patient and have faith. we all want climbing to be accessible, we really do.
and i promise i'll get off my ass soon and actually finish up another newsletter so you know a bit more of what's going on. it'd already be out if i didn't suck quite so much