Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:10 pm
As an aside, Dipsi and Spragwa were two of the first to reply and say they wanted to be in it. I suppose any time someone's picture is taken, they are "objectified," as they are no longer their actual selves but a depiction of themselves in that moment, which could be generalized to be an "object."
So, if someone poses in a sexy picture, are they being objectified; whereas someone who doesn't know their picture is being taken is not objectified? If that is the case, maybe we could all just hang out at RRO and Chester could pop up at random intervals and snap shots. We could be guaranteed not to look hot, and thus the calendar would be politically correct. There are so many lines to draw when it comes to stuff like this. The way I see it, we'll be having fun and capturing a few moments of it, and if we make some money for the coalition, then awesome.
So, if someone poses in a sexy picture, are they being objectified; whereas someone who doesn't know their picture is being taken is not objectified? If that is the case, maybe we could all just hang out at RRO and Chester could pop up at random intervals and snap shots. We could be guaranteed not to look hot, and thus the calendar would be politically correct. There are so many lines to draw when it comes to stuff like this. The way I see it, we'll be having fun and capturing a few moments of it, and if we make some money for the coalition, then awesome.
