Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:36 pm
Very Cool! Someone should be sure this article makes it to the Climbing Museum.
I was working alone on our house mid week when Sarah Vos phoned me out of the blue and wanted to come down with a photographer. She wanted to talk about Muir and take pixs of some of the rock there, and of course it wouldn't look right without a climber attached thereto. So, I called Matt and Amy, who were probably the only climbers down there at this time of year mid week, and they were kind enough to grab their gear and come over to the Valley. We put Matt on a very cold wet (!), but photogenic, route at the Great Arch and the photog did the rest.Steve wrote:It was really cool to see Matt monkeyin' up some rock on the front page of the paper as I went for my morning coffee. Very cool.
I love to hear other people's take on stories like this one. I thought the the whole private land recreation issues was burried a little to far down in the article. Guess I was looking for the hard news off the top as opposed to a featurey stuff first. But what do I know? It was good pub for sure.
Anyone know how they came across Muir, the Webers, et al for the story?
Just to clarify --Sunshine wrote:...
I liked it when Weber said that some ["setter uppers" are better than other "setter uppers"]! I hope we can find more good "route setters".
Well done Sarah!
Terry Kindred
She wasn't there when the reporter visited.Saxman wrote:Why wasn't Liz in on the photo love?