heehee, he called me "babe."JB wrote:sorry babe...
further, if you were offended about my generalizations of atheists, consider your own generalizations about believers. we're all big hypocrites if you ask me.
I'm an atheist and filled with a lot of love. Sure, I get impatient and beat my fist on my desk, but is god supposed to help me with that?I know there are a FEW atheists who have fun and are genuinely fine human beings
What's to say that we've found it yet? Or that there had been life but it passed on or that life is in the process as we speak.kato wrote:It seems to me that if there were any robustness to the theory of evolution, Mars and Venus should be teeming with life. Probably the gas giants, too, and most of their larger moons.
Meadows wrote: I'll see you at the 2005 Hypocrit Convention where all are welcome ... sort of.
If Darwin is on the money, it should be coming to find us! Look, I'm a little disappointed that we haven't found anything on Mars yet. A little algae, a lichen, or something. But a true evolutionist should find Darwin's own alien, not merely a survivor, but a species killer! Timeline shmimeline, there ought to be something out there that will curl Sigourney Weaver's toes, acid blooded, methane breathing, magma eating, silicon skinned body snatchers that have clawed their way to the top of their stellar Galapagos leaving a trail of extinct missing links behind them. Something to give the human race a run for it's money. Look at us, we're soft, weak, naked, clawless, fangless, and blogs have convinced me that our reasoning power is pretty overrated and here we are at the top of the evolutionary ladder. Darwin was off his nut.meetVA wrote:What's to say that we've found it yet?
Oh I'm converted. SFM, unite!kato wrote:...blogs have convinced me that our reasoning power is pretty overrated and here we are at the top...Darwin was off his nut.
Oh dang it! Wait, internal disequilibrium, I may have to hold off my conversion.meetVA wrote:kato wrote:..but a species killer..meetVA wrote:Look at staph infections that antibiotics can't touch.
Wait a minute. Who are the 'cynical and hate filled' people here? The proponents of ID consistently lie and misrepresent themselves. Real scientists have to constantly stand up and present honest, good-faith arguments for the reality of evolution, while the ID camp endlessly present 'misprepresentations' and use 'stealth'. In fact, the whole 'ID' thing is at it's core, a lie - simply a big cover for Creationism. Several of the 'scientists' who are paid by the 'ID movement' have explicity admited that they were 'stealth' students and factuly at real universities so that they could get credentials with which to attack real science. The ID movement constantly misrepresents genuine scientific differences and questions as 'faults' and 'contradictions' that supposedly undermine the theory of evolution - when they know perfectly well that these do not. They know perfectly well that there is no controversey whatsoever, but they endlessly claim that there is. Who is cynical - the stealthy liars or the honest scientists?JB wrote:i will now become as cynical and hate filled about religion as you sorry sons o bitches... sorry. my bad generalization of atheists.
