Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 12:32 am
by unk
KD wrote:welcome to the Bushenomic age - the big corp. eat the small ones up so the working consumer can't get a break. Same thing at the gas pumps. saw the same stuff during Nixon in the 70's. Time will clear it up as soon as the voters get tierd and a new cycle gets going.
There were a higher eprcentage of takeovers druing Mr Clinton's Presidency, than at any other time in US history. Since this phenomena exists in every other capitalist society, perhaps you should realize it has nothing at all to do with the administration, past or present, that resides in your White House. Instead, you may want to research the concept:
MARKET FORCES which can be found in most rudimentary economic texts. Of course, the assumption is that you can not only read, but may even be able to comprehend factual informatuion (despite the fact that there is nothing in your posts that would give that indication).....
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:19 am
by pianomahnn
KD wrote:welcome to the Bushenomic age
Bushenomic? Are you saying this practice is only evident during a Bush presidency?
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 6:08 am
by KD
unk not only can I comphrend factual information, I can discuss political opinion without resorting to personal attacks.
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 12:17 pm
by unk
KD wrote:unk not only can I comphrend factual information, I can discuss political opinion without resorting to personal attacks.
That is very nice!
Can you discuss poitical opinion while rersorting to actual information as well, or must you remain mired in a quagmire of poorly spelled emotional responses?
If you feel that what was made above was a personal attack, you gapparently have very little experience in the subject matter. Analysinf your posts and coming to the conclusion that you are young, immature, and inexperienced is not an attack. It is an analytical statetement that you have verified with your own vocabulary and syntax.
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:56 pm
by Yasmeen
unk wrote:KD wrote:unk not only can I comphrend factual information, I can discuss political opinion without resorting to personal attacks.
That is very nice!
Can you discuss poitical opinion while rersorting to actual information as well, or must you remain mired in a quagmire of
poorly spelled emotional responses?
If you feel that what was made above was a personal attack, you
gapparently have very little experience in the subject matter.
Analysinf your posts and coming to the conclusion that you are young, immature, and inexperienced is not an attack. It is an analytical statetement that you have verified with your own vocabulary and syntax.
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:03 pm
by unk
Yasmeen wrote:unk wrote:KD wrote:unk not only can I comphrend factual information, I can discuss political opinion without resorting to personal attacks.
That is very nice!
Can you discuss poitical opinion while rersorting to actual information as well, or must you remain mired in a quagmire of
poorly spelled emotional responses?
If you feel that what was made above was a personal attack, you
gapparently have very little experience in the subject matter.
Analysinf your posts and coming to the conclusion that you are young, immature, and inexperienced is not an attack. It is an analytical statetement that you have verified with your own vocabulary and syntax.
Thank you for pointing out my hypocrisy. I deeply apprecite it to the point that I will allow my idiocy to stand, un-edited. Perhaps I need to speell check, or learn your language a little better, eh?
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:04 pm
by Yasmeen
unk wrote:Perhaps I need to speell check, or learn your language a little better, eh?
Did you just call me a camel jockey!?
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:04 pm
by Guest
I'm pretty sure he called you a towel head.
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:11 pm
by lordjim_2001
It's rag head, not towel head. You get the dig by implying that they can't afford a towel for a turban and that they are not white.
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:12 pm
by Guest
dammit, I changed that twice! I need to get better at cultural slurs.