Liability Issues

Access, Rehab Projects, Derbyfests and more...
TrueNorth
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 4:10 am

Post by TrueNorth »

Johnny: There was an article in Outside about a year ago dealing with risk management, titled "Risk". I found it to be a very informative article. We changed all of our liability release forms after reading the article. I'll forward you a copy. Drop me a PM wt an address.

The article stemmed from Jeff Lowe loosing a client, when the client used a voice commands "I'm OK" and it was confused with "Off Belay". The client leaned back thinking he was still 'On Belay' and fell 100 + feet. Unfortunately he died. The lawsuits that followed opened new issues for the industry.

Guys...for those who short cut the gear check and command sequence, there is a damn good reason these poceedures exist.

You may want to do a Lexis Nexis search on Jeff Lowe and Western Colorado Insurance.
J
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:59 am

Post by J »

thanks everybody, this is something I had always wandered about and it usually doesn't come up.
Dwayne
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 8:56 am

Post by Dwayne »

It's usually the surviving relatives that file he lawsuit. never say never. Recently, a guy sued a motor home manufacturer because the owners manuel did not specify that by engaging the cruise control, the driver must still steer the vehicle.
Guest

Post by Guest »

did he win?
GWG
Posts: 840
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 1:45 pm

Post by GWG »

In my opinion, waivers keep honest people honest. At our gym, even though we have every climber sign a waiver, there are still law suites. If I am neglegent, then shame on me, I deserve whatever is dealt me. However, if someone is bouldering and when they come of the wall, they step off the pad, roll over their foot and break their ankle, should I be at fault for that? Unfortunately, there are some people who see an opportunity to get something for nothing which ends up hurting everyone.

It is beyond me why I need to protect myself through insurance against other people's stupidity. It is impossible to idiot proof the world!

As you can tell, I have no patience for people like that. I am glad to see that in several cases, the "system" is working correctly.

Enough of my soapbox preaching. It's time to climb!!! :D
Guest

Post by Guest »

GWG, Which Gym is you?
GWG
Posts: 840
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 1:45 pm

Post by GWG »

I climb at both Rocksport and Hester's in Louisville but am mostly out of Rocksport. I travel a ton and will try to hit whatever local gym happens to be where I'm at. The story is the same at most places.

Most have had a situation where someone is pressing the worthiness of the waiver with some assinine lawsuit.

GWG
Legion
Posts: 539
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:15 am

Post by Legion »

JH read True North's post and note that the lawsuit was filed by the deceased climber's spouse. Though most of us have good intentions and accept the risks involved with climbing we can't always predict who might sue after we croak.

Nice finishing agreement. Better put it in writing. Remember the guy who blugeoned his buddy into the afterlife because they ran out of water a quarter mile from the road?
Johnny
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 9:28 pm

Post by Johnny »

Here's Kentucky's Recreational Use Statute:

411.190 Obligations of owner to persons using land for recreation


(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Land" means land, roads, water, watercourses, private ways and buildings, structures, and machinery or equipment when attached to the realty;
(b) "Owner" means the possessor of a fee, reversionary, or easement interest, a tenant, lessee, occupant, or person in control of the premises;
(c) "Recreational purpose" includes, but is not limited to, any of the following, or any combination thereof: hunting, fishing, swimming, boating, camping, picnicking, hiking, bicycling, horseback riding, pleasure driving, nature study, water-skiing, winter sports, and viewing or enjoying historical, archaeological, scenic, or scientific sites; and
(d) "Charge" means the admission price or fee asked in return for invitation or permission to enter or go upon the land but does not include fees for general use permits issued by a government agency for access to public lands if the permits are valid for a period of not less than thirty (30) days.
(2) The purpose of this section is to encourage owners of land to make land and water areas available to the public for recreational purposes by limiting their liability toward persons entering thereon for such purposes.
(3) Except as specifically recognized by or provided in subsection (6) of this section, an owner of land owes no duty of care to keep the premises safe for entry or use by others for recreational purposes, or to give any warning of a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity on the premises to persons entering for such purposes.
(4) Except as specifically recognized by or provided in subsection (6) of this section, an owner of land who either directly or indirectly invites or permits without charge any person to use the property for recreation purposes does not thereby:
(a) Extend any assurance that the premises are safe for any purpose;
(b) Confer upon the person the legal status of an invitee or licensee to whom a duty of care is owed; or
(c) Assume responsibility for or incur liability for any injury to person or property caused by an act or omission of those persons.
(5) Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the provisions of subsections (3) and (4) of this section shall be deemed applicable to the duties and liability of an owner of land leased to the state or any subdivision thereof for recreational purposes.
(6) Nothing in this section limits in any way any liability which otherwise exists:
(a) For willful or malicious failure to guard or warn against a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity; or
(b) For injury suffered in any case where the owner of land charges the person or persons who enter or go on the land for the recreational use thereof, except that in the case of land leased to the state or a subdivision thereof, any consideration received by the owner for the lease shall not be deemed a charge within the meaning of this section.
(7) Nothing in this section shall be construed to:
(a) Create a duty of care or ground of liability for injury to persons or property;
(b) Relieve any person using the land of another for recreational purposes from any obligation which he may have in the absence of this section to exercise care in his use of the land and in his activities thereon, or from the legal consequences of failure to employ such care; or
(c) Ripen into a claim for adverse possession, absent a claim of title or legal right.
(8) No action for the recovery of real property, including establishment of prescriptive easement, right-of-way, or adverse possession, may be brought by any person whose claim is based on use solely for recreational purposes.
Johnny
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 9:28 pm

Post by Johnny »

Cool. Posting the statute turned the ( 8 ) into a "sly face".
Post Reply