Page 2 of 4
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:52 pm
by TradMike
For the photos and sometimes the articles but it has to be a very interesting article.
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:30 pm
by RRO
they used to be good , or maybe i used to be impressed easier. either way, now most of them are barely good enough to put on the back of the toilet seat. i am usually done with them after letting the children out to play and swim 2-3 times.
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 3:33 pm
by toad857
the photos
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:21 pm
by Jeff
I've been getting Climbing for free lately from MGear or something. Go through it once or twice, usually not impressed much, and into the recycling bin.
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:46 pm
by rjackson
I'm a print guy, from before the internet. Used to be the best way to get information was from targeted periodicals (there's a magazine for everything, and sometimes multiples). I go through 'em from cover to cover, but I have to admit that I don't devour the words like I used to as there just isn't enough time in the day. Even if editorial content changes with regimes and popular demand, magazines are still a cheap, mobile and for the most part trusted source of information and inspiration.
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:09 pm
by OZ
The graph is giving a 102%. Way to go, graph!
Re: The Mags
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:25 pm
by pigsteak
what graph?
Re: The Mags
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:58 am
by OZ
The bar graph at the top of the page. I guess it can only be seen when not logged in.
Re: The Mags
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:28 am
by pigsteak
ah...ty