New Camera Photo assualt, Day One: Roadside
New Camera Photo assualt, Day One: Roadside
Last edited by Wes on Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
"There is no secret ingredient"
Po, the kung fu panda
Po, the kung fu panda
-
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:01 am
-
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 2:07 pm
yea exposure is key. i still have alot of problems in high contrast situations. i often feel like the exposure forces the shot. but i probably just need to learn to see through the lense more.
i am thinking of transitioning to a digital slr as well. 8mp seems decent enough, but if i wait a year i know i can get 10 for the same price. then you are in the pro range.
i am thinking of transitioning to a digital slr as well. 8mp seems decent enough, but if i wait a year i know i can get 10 for the same price. then you are in the pro range.
Back from the Dead!
Actually, many pro's shot with Mark II that are *only* 6mp. The key is that the optics in a dSLR, with a really nice lens, more then makes up for not being super high megapixels. 8mp is more then enough for 99% on work. I mean, that is like 32 X 48 inches! Plus, while things always get bigger and better, if you have it now, you get to use it now...
Wes
Wes
"There is no secret ingredient"
Po, the kung fu panda
Po, the kung fu panda
you can sell to catalogs and for news items but climbing and rock and ice won't even look at anything less then 10mp for features, gallerys, and calender shots.
some pros i know are moving to 16 now. crazy.
to my eyes the lens is all that really matters though, so i am in agreement with you.
some pros i know are moving to 16 now. crazy.
to my eyes the lens is all that really matters though, so i am in agreement with you.
Back from the Dead!